ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
Êîíêóðñ ïëàêàòîâ, ïîñâÿùåííûé 275-ëåòèþ Ìîñêîâñêîé àðõèòåêòóðíîé øêîëû
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
ÔÅÑÒÈÂÀËÜ ÍÀÓÊÈ
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

3(52) 2020


Article MAIN TRENDS ÎF RUSSIAN URBAN PLANNING – FROM THE 1990s TO THE 2000s
Authors

D. Fesenko
Arkhitekturnyy Vestnik Magazine, Moscow, Russia

Abstract The 1990s for Russian urban planning became perhaps the most difficult period in its history. The article analyzes the prerequisites for disciplinary progress within the architectural profession, when urban planning, along with landscape architecture and the protection of monuments and restoration, was forced out of professional life. 2000s turn out to be the starting point for the subsequent exit from the historical impasse. The main trends in the urban development sphere of that time are reviewed: the spread of integrated development projects (COT), new urban formations, suburban villages, positioned as a place of permanent residence. The author dwells in detail on urban and social dysfunctions as a consequence of developmental pressures that became apparent by the end of the 2000s: distortion of urban landscapes, transport collapse, leaching of public spaces, building development of green areas, loss of cultural heritage sites.
Keywords: urban planning, interior design, new urban formations, social and urban dysfunctions, the 1990s – 2000s
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Fesenko D. O natsional'nykh osobennostyakh, universal'nom mekhanizme i uletayushchikh v trubu milliardakh. Arkhitektura kak instrument konstruirovaniya budushchego. Ot arkhitekturnoy istorii XX-XXI vekov do novoy urbanisticheskoy politiki [About national features, a universal mechanism and billions flying away into a pipe. Architecture as a tool for constructing the future. From the architectural history of the XX-XXI centuries to the new urban policy]. Moscow, Librokom, 2017, pp. 141–144.
  2. Fesenko D. Tret'ya volna diletantizma, ili komu arkhitektory i gradostroiteli ustupayut svoye mesto. Rossiyskaya arkhitektura – na krayu [The third wave of amateurism, or to whom architects and urban planners give way. Russian architecture is on the edge]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2015, pp. 177–178.
  3. Bokov A. Dve v odnoj. O prirode i sledstvijah vnutriarhitekturnogo konflikta [Two in one. On the nature and consequences of intraarchitectural conflict]. Moscow, 2015 (in manuscript), etc.
  4. Logvinov V. Fantaziya ili prognoz? Doroga k Khramu semnadtsat' let spustya [Fantasy or forecast? The road to the Temple seventeen years later]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2015, no.3, pp. 56–63.
  5. Podrobnee o novyh gradobrazovanijah [More about new city formations]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2008, no. 2, pp. 15–19.
  6. Skokan A. Rossiiskaya arkhitektura. 1989-2009. Noveishaya era. [Russian architecture. 1989-2019. Recent era]. Moscow, 2019, p. 101.
  7. Logvinov V. [Death of architecture and the prospects of pigsties. Construction expert]. 2016, October 10.
  8. Fesenko D., Baburov V., Ivanov A., Krasheninnikov A., Kudryavtsev F. Novyye gradobrazovaniya: za i protiv. Teoriya arkhitekturnogo protsessa: kontury novoy paradigmy [New city formation: pros and cons. Theory of the architectural process: the contours of a new paradigm]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2010, pp. 173–177.
  9. Fesenko D. Derevyannaya arkhitektura kak supertrend. Rossiyskaya arkhitektura – na krayu [Wooden architecture as a super trend. Russian architecture is on the edge]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2015, pp. 72–79.
  10. Fesenko D. Moskva – v tochke perekhoda. O sootnoshenii plyusov i minusov. Teoriya arkhitekturnogo protsessa: kontury novoy paradigm [Moscow is at the transition point. On the ratio of pluses and minuses. Theory of the architectural process: the contours of a new paradigm]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2010, pp. 199–204.
  11. Logvinov V. Arhitektura v chasah, rubljah i kubometrah. Arhitekturnyj Vestnik [Architecture in hours, rubles and cubic meters. Architectural Bulletin]. 2007, no. 6.
  12. Fesenko D. Uglubleniye trenda – ot urbanizma k terplanirovaniyu i rasseleniyu. Rossiyskaya arkhitektura – na krayu [The deepening trend - from urbanism to urban planning and resettlement. Russian architecture is on the edge]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2015, pp. 182–186.
  13. Fesenko D. Zagorodnyy dom dlya srednego klassa – «vtoroye zhilishche gorozhanina»? Moscow, Fasad / Razrez. Rossiyskaya arkhitektura 1990-2000-kh [Country house for the middle class - “the second dwelling of a citizen”]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2008, pp. 415–416.
  14. Logvinov V. Potrebnosti obshhestva i gosudarstvennaja politika v oblasti arhitektury i gradostroitel'stva. Arhitekturnyj Vestnik [The needs of society and state policy in the field of architecture and urban planning. Architectural Bulletin]. 2006, no. 3.
  15. Fesenko D., Ivanov A. Zagorodnyye poselki – k «gated community» sezonnogo prozhivaniya? Monitoring «AV» / «ASD» [Country villages – to the "gated community" of seasonal residence? Monitoring "AV" / "ASD"]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2006, no. 1, pp. 54–65.
  16. Fesenko D. Kamo gryadeshi? ili Arkhitekturnyy landshaft posle krizisa-2 [Quo vadis? or Architectural landscape after the crisis-2]. Moscow, «AV» Magazine, 2020, no.2, pp. 4–7.
  17. Fesenko D. The main trends in Russian urban planning in the late 2000s - the second half of the 2010s. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 2(51), pp. 144–166. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/2kvart20/PDF/10_fesenko.pdfDOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15110.

For citation

Fesenko D. Main Trends of Russian Urban Planning – from the 1990s to the 2000s. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 3(52), pp. 156172. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/3kvart20/PDF/08_fesenko.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15208