ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

1(54) 2021


Article TECHNOLOGICAL FEATURES OF GLUED WOODEN STRUCTURES
Authors E. Akshov
Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract The article considers technological features of glued wooden structures as perspective building elements with high strength characteristics and ease of transportation. Their production and influence on the environment are researched. According to the data on carbon dioxide uptake and biogenic carbon retention, the ecological advantages of using glued wooden structures are showcased. The article shows the variability of the production of glued wooden structures using FRP fiberglass glue or an alternative method based on dowel joints.
Keywords: ecological paradigm, glulam in architecture, life-cycle assessment (LCA), LVL-beam, CLT-panels
article Article (RUS)
  1. References

  1. Valentini R., Matteucci G., Dolman A.J., Schulze E.-D., Rebmann C., Moors E.J. et al. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Journal Nature, 2000, vol. 404, pp. 861–865.
  2. Broadmeadow M., Matthews R. Forests, carbon and climate change: the UK contribution. For. Comm. Inf. Note 48, 2003, pp. 1–12.
  3. Puettmann M., Sinha A., Ganguly I. Life cycle energy and environmental impacts of cross laminated timber made with coastal douglas-fir. Journal of Green Building, 2019, 14(4), pp. 17–33.
  4. Dementev D. Modern Experience of Multi-Apartment Wooden Houses Construction in Foreign Countries. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 1(50), pp. 95–108. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/1kvart20/PDF/06_dementiev.pdf
  5. Bowers T., M.E. Puettmann I. Ganguly, Eastin I. Cradle-to-gate life-cycle assessment of glue-laminated (glulam): Environmental Impacts from glulam produced in the US Pacific Northwest and southeast. Forest Products Journal, 2017, no. 67(5/6), pp. 368–380.
  6. Li Z., Zhou R., He M., Sun X. Modern timber construction technology and engineering applications in China. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Civil Eng., 2019, no. 172(5), pp. 17–27.
  7. Plevris N., Triantafillou T.C. FRP-reinforced wood as structural materials. J. Mater. Civil Eng., 1992, no. 4(3), pp. 300–317.
  8. Tingley D.A. High-strength fiber-reinforced plastic of wood and wood composite. 41st international society for the advancement of material and process engineering (SAMPE) symposium. Anaheim, California, 1996, pp. 667–673.
  9. Tingley D.A. Over a decade of research results in new, improved glulam. Canadian Consulting Engineer, 1996, pp. 24–28.
  10. Dorey A.B., Cheng R.J. Development of composite glued laminated timber. Canadian Forest Service Cat. Fo42-91/146-1996E. Canadian-Alberta Partnership Agreement in Forestry. Edmonton, Alta, 1996.
  11. Hindman D.P., Bouldin J.C Mechanical properties of southern pine cross-laminated timber. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015.

For citation

Akshov E. Technological Features of Glued Wooden Structures. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2021, no. 1(54), pp. 156–164. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2021/1kvart21/PDF/10_akshov.pdf DOI: 10.24412/1998-4839-2021-1-156-164