ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ
Main | News | Contacts | Museum | History | Books | Map


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

4(53) 2020
Article BALTIC URBAN REGIONS AS ACTUAL AND PERSPECTIVE OBJECTS OF STRATEGIC PLANNING
Authors

M. Monastyrskaya, O. Peslyak
Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Abstract The article substantiates the relevance and expediency of studying specific forms of European urbanization – urbanized regions of the Baltic States as objects of strategic (long-term, medium-term) planning. The concept and phenomenon of «urbanized region» are described, and its place in the typological hierarchy of large urbanized territories formed over the past decades in the countries of Northern, Western and Eastern Europe is determined. The basic gradotypological features of urbanized regions have been established, according to which two subtypes of such spatial formations belonging to the meso- and micro-levels of macro-regional habitat arrangement have been identified: «supranational» and «national», which differ in the state affiliation of the territories included in their borders, sea and underground spaces. Specific examples of purposeful formation of urbanized regions in Germany, Denmark, Norway, Finland and Sweden are considered; the institutional, regulatory, and organizational components of their strategic spatial planning process are characterized. On this basis, the specificity of urbanized regions as objects of spatial strategizing and urban planning, as well as management of their functioning and development is determined. The results of the research can serve as an information-theoretical and analog basis for the formation of a system of strategic planning of innovative forms of urban settlement in our country and, thus, contribute to the improvement of the current system of urban planning in the Russian Federation for large urbanized territories.
Keywords: urban regions, strategic planning, urban planning, settlement, Baltic region
article Article (RUS)
  1. References

  1. European Spatial Development Perspective, Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union (Agreed at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning, May 1999). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
  2. Spirina Ju.V. Transgranichnoe prostranstvennoe planirovanie v Baltijskom regione [Cross-border spatial planning in the Baltic region. Bulletin of The Kant Russian state University]. 2009, no. 1, pp. 92–96.
  3. Potemkina O.Ju. Stanovlenie obnovlennoj Evropy (Evropejskoe prostranstvo svobody, bezopasnosti i pravoporyadka – novyj proekt ES) [Formation of a renewed Europe (European Space of Freedom, Security and Law and Order – a New EU Project). Modern Europe]. 2001, no. 3(7), pp. 24–36.
  4. Krasheninnikov A. Urban Development and Built environment. Releigh, North Carolina, USA: Open Science Publishing, 2017, 170 p.
  5. Kivikari U. Ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo Baltijskogo regiona [Economic Space Baltic Sea Region]. Helsinki, OTAVA publishing House, 1996, 156 p.
  6. Sologub A.P. Mezhdunarodnaya proektnaya deyatel'nost' kak odin iz mekhanizmov konstruirovaniya Baltijskogo regiona [International project activity as one of the mechanisms of construction of the Baltic region. Vestnik of Volgogradskyiy State university]. 2015, no. 6(36), pp. 101–110.
  7. Klemeshev A.P., Korneevec V.S., Palmovskiy T., Studjnickiy T., Fedorov G.M. Podhody k opredeleniyu ponyatiya «Baltijskij region» [Approaches to the definition of the concept "Baltic Region". Balti Region]. 2017, no. 4, pp. 7–28.
  8. Bolotnikova E.G., Mezhevich N.M. «Severnoe izmerenie» i Strategiya Evropejskogo Soyuza dlya regiona Baltijskogo morya ["Northern Dimension" and the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Pskov Regionalological Journal]. No. 13, pp. 37–47.
  9. Monastyrskaya M.E., Peslyak O.A. Sovremennye metody delimitacii granic gorodskih aglomeracij (Evropejskie nauka i praktika) [Modern Methods of Delimiting the Boundaries of urban agglomerations (European science and practice). Magazine Urban Planning and Architecture]. 2017, no. 3(28), pp. 80–86.
  10. Hønneland G. Identity Formation in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region. Cooperation and Conflic, 1998, no. 33, pp. 277–297.
  11. strategii social'no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija Kaliningradskoj oblasti na dolgosrochchnuju perspektivu [On the strategy of socio-economic development of the Kaliningrad region for the long term 2012 (Resolution Of the government of the Kaliningrad region ¹583 dated 02.08.2019)]. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/469728648
  12. Monastyrskaya M.E., Peslyak O.A. Innovacionnye algoritmy opredeleniya granic gorodskih aglomeracij i urbanizirovannyh regionov [Innovative algorithms for determining the boundaries of urban agglomerations and urbanized regions. An innovative album of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences]. 2018, no. 2017–1, pp. 9–10.
  13. Strategiya prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2025 goda [The spatial development strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025]. Available at: http://static.government.ru/media/files/UVAlqUtT08o60RktoOXl22JjAe7irNxc.pdf
  14. Ivanov O.B., Buhval'd E.M. «Geostrategicheskie territorii» i «tochki rosta» v strategirovanii prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii ["Geostrategic territories" and "points of growth" in strategizing the spatial development of the Russian Federation. ETAP]. 2019, no. 4, pp. 7–23.
  15. Pal'movskij T., Tarkovskij M. Sotrudnichestvo stran regiona Baltijskogo morya v oblasti morskogo prostranstvennogo planirovaniya [Cooperation of the countries of the Baltic sea region in the field of marine spatial planning. Magazine Baltic Region]. Baltijskij region, 2018, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 100–113.
  16. Monastyrskaya M.E., Peslyak O.A. Specifika gradostroitel'nogo planirovaniya krupnyh urbanizirovannyh territorij v Skandinavskih stranah. CHast' I: monopoliya municipal'nogo planirovaniya v SHvecii [Specifics of urban planning of large urbanized territories in the Scandinavian countries. Part I: municipal planning monopoly in Sweden. Bulletin BSTU. V.G. Shukhova]. 2020, no. 8, pp. 46–60.
  17. Ptichnikova G.A. Gradostroitel'stvo i arhitektura SHvecii, 1980–2000 [Urban Planning and Architecture in Sweden. 1980–2000]. St. Petersburg, 1999, 200 p.
  18. Fedorov G.M., Korneevec V.S. Evroregiony – novyj format vzaimodejstviya Êîñìîïîëèñ [Euroregions – a new format of interaction. Magazine Cosmopolis]. 2008, no. 2(21), pp. 78–85.
  19. Efremenko I.N., Karaya Yu.V. Razvitie integracionnyh processov stran Baltijskogo regiona [Development of integration processes in the Baltic region. Bulletin of Rostov State Economic University (RINH)]. 2013, no. 1–2, pp. 126–132.
  20. Kovalyov A.M. Eshche raz o formacionnom i civilizacionnom podhodah [Once again about the formation and civilizational approaches. Society of science and modernity]. 1996, no 1, pp. 97–104.
  21. Lebedev G.S. Baltijskaya morskaya civilizaciya: Put' iz varyag v greki i peterburgskij mif [Baltic sea civilization: The way from the Varangians to the Greeks and the Petersburg myth. Historiosophical problems of social sciences at the turn of the millennium: 2nd half. XIX-XX centuries. Modern vision of history: abstracts of the conference (May 30-31, 1996)]. St. Petersburg, 1996, pp. 97–99.
  22. Meijers E., Waterhout B., Zonneveld W. Polycentric Development Policies in European Countries: An Introduction. Built Environment, 2005, no. 31, pp. 97–102.
  23. Zonova T.V. Ot Evropy gosudarstv k Evrope regionov [From Europe of States to Europe of regions. Magazine Polis]. 1999, no. 5, pp. 155–164.
  24. The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Available at: https://www.balticsea-region-strategy.eu/
  25. Zenker S. Jacobsen B. Inter-Regional Place Branding: Best Practices, Challenges and Solutions. Springer, 2015, 184 p.
  26. ESPON EU-LUPA European Land Use Patterns. Volume VI. The Oresund Region Case Study Report, 2012, Ver. 30, 96 p. Available at: https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/Volume_VI_Case_studies_Oresund.pdf
  27. NORDEGIO Policy Brief, 2019, no. 10. Available at: http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1347730/FULLTEXT02.pdf
  28. Olsvold H. Polycentric development in the Greater Oslo Region. An analysis of population development and commuting patterns between 2001 and 2015. University of Oslo, 2018, 82 p.
  29. Wolfert C., Sondermann K.-U. Scandria Corridor Status Report “Final Status Report – Outline of Alliance”. Interreg, 2019, 60 p.
  30. METREX Nordic-Baltic Space Transnational Development Perspective Urban Environment Publications, 2019, no. 9, 138 p.
  31. Jacobs, J. Spatial Planning in Cross-border Regions: A Systems-theoretical Perspective. Planning Theory, 2016, no. 1, pp. 68–90.
  32. Giacometti A., Scherbenske S.L. Land-based spatial planning and the added value of cross-border cooperation. Nordegio, 2015, 42 p.
  33. The Helsinki-uusimaa regional programme Vision and Strategy 2040 Strategic Priorities 2014–2017 Uusimaa Regional Council, Helsinki. 2014. Available at: http://www.uusimaa2019.fi/files/13281/Helsinki-Uusimaa_Regional_Programme_A31-2014.pdf
  34. Galland D., Enemark S. Danish National Spatial Planning Framework Fluctuating Capacities of Planning Policies and Institutions. Available at: https://nmbu.brage.unit.no/nmbu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2574013/2015%2BGalland%2B%2526%2BEnemark.pdf?sequence=1
  35. Smas L., Lidmo Jo. Organising regions: spatial planning and territorial governance practices in two swedish regions. Europa XXI, 2018, no. 35, pp. 21–36.
  36. Kerndrup S. Self-Evaluation Report: Jutland-Funen, Denmark. Supporting the Contribution of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Development. OECD/IMHE project, 2006,119 p.
  37. Skåne's Regional Development Strategy June 2014. Available at: https://utveckling.skane.se/en/SysSiteAssets/publikationer_dokument/rus_slutdokument_210x275_eng.pdf
  38. Jauhiainen Ju, Harvio S., Luukkonen Ju., Helka A., Jauhiainen M., Kalliomäki H. Regional development zones in Finland: Territorial cohesion and competitiveness. Fennia, 2010, 185 p.
  39. Mityagin S.D. Morskoe prostranstvennoe planirovanie – novoe napravlenie prostranstvennoj organizacii Rossijskoj Federacii [Marine spatial planning – a new direction in the spatial organization of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Zodchij. 21st century: information and analytical journal]. 2016, no. 4, pp. 4–7.
  40. Directive 2014/89/EU – Maritime Spatial Planning of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. European Commission, 2014. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/directive-2014-89-eu-maritime

For citation

Monastyrskaya M., Peslyak O. Baltic Urban Regions as Actual and Perspective Objects of Strategic Planning. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 4(53), pp. 249–265. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/4kvart20/PDF/15_monastyrskaya.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15315



  ÌÀÐÕÈ © 2006
Ïîæåëàíèÿ è ïðåäëîæåíèÿ ïî ðàáîòå ñàéòà íàïðàâëÿéòå àäìèíèñòðàöèè ïî àäðåñó: [email protected]
Èíòåðíåò-àãåíòñòâî "Àìèáýëü"