ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÇÎËÎÒÀß ÌÅÄÀËÜ ÌÀÐÕÈ 2023
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2023/2024 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
ÊÎÍÊÓÐÑ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
Èíòåëëåêòóàëüíûé êðàåâåä÷åñêèé äèêòàíò
Êðàòêîñðî÷íûå ïîäãîòîâèòåëüíûå êóðñû 1.5 ìåñÿöà
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÓÍÈÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒÑÊÈÅ ÑÓÁÁÎÒÛ
Âñåìèðíûé ôåñòèâàëü ìîëîä¸æè 2024
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

4(45) 2018


Article Diversity of ideas about the «modernity» CONCEPT IN domestic architecture of the 20-21st centuries
Authors

Y. Volchok, Scientific and Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture, Moscow, Russia

Abstract The concept of «modernity» connects the past, the present and the future. The key is the action that unites the movement of time. It gives shape to the problem field of research. Its purpose is to reveal how creativity in architecture depends on the author's interpretation of the term «modernity». Creative concepts in the architecture of the 20th and 21st centuries are considered as a dialogue between the requirements of culture and opportunities provided at each stage of the civilization «ladder». An attempt is made to construct a spatial model of coexistence in the dynamics of the common time of interests and aspirations into the past, the present and the future.
Keywords: architecture, modernity, present continuous tense, epoch, periodization of creativity, competitions, past and future
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Ginzburg M.Ya. Stil i epoha. Problemy sovremennoj arxitektury [Style and era. Problems of modern architecture]. Moscow, OGIZ, 1924, 238 p.
  2. Shvab K. Texnologii Chetvertoj promy`shlennoj revolyucii [Technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution]. Moscow, 2018, 320 p.
  3. Panofskij E. IDEA. K istorii ponyatiya v teoriyax iskusstva ot antichnosti do klassicizma [IDEA. On the history of the concept in the theories of art from antiquity to classicism]. St. Petersburg, 1999, 237 p.
  4. Stepanov Yu.S. V trexmernom prostranstve yazy`ka. Semioticheskie problemy` lingvistiki, filosofii i iskusstva [In the three-dimensional space of the language. Semiotic problems of linguistics, philosophy and art]. Moscow, 2016, 334 p.
  5. Tolstoj L.N. Pis`mo N.N. Straxovu. Sobr.sochinenij v 22 tomax [Letter N.N. Strakhov. Collected essays in 22 volumes]. Vol.18, Moscow, 1984, pp. 784-786. Available at: https://rvb.ru/tolstoy/01text/vol_17_18/vol_18/0656.htm
  6. Ranchin A.M. Roman L.N. Tolstogo «Anna Karenina»: zamy`sel, smy`sl e`pigrafa i avtorskaya poziciya» [Roman L.N. Tolstoy "Anna Karenina": the idea, the meaning of the epigraph and the author's position]. Available at: http://www.portal-slovo.ru/philology/43318.php
  7. Vejdle V. Biologiya iskusstva. V knige E`mbriologiya poe`zii. Stat`i po poe`tike i teorii iskusstva [Biology of art. In the book Embryology of Poetry. Articles on poetry and theory of art]. Moscow, 2002, pp. 98-102. Available at: https://profilib.org/chtenie/103548/v-veydle-embriologiya-poezii-98.php#t1
  8. Baxtin M.M. Problema soderzhaniya, materiala i formy` v slovesnom xudozhestvennom tvorchestve. V knige Voprosy` literatury` i e`stetiki [The problem of content, material and form in verbal art. In the book Questions of literature and aesthetics]. Moscow, 1975, 504 p.
  9. Bibixin V.V. Novy`j Renessans [New Renaissance]. Moscow, Progress-Tradiciya, 1998, 496 p.
  10. Mikhailova, A.A., Danilova L.M., Zaitseva N.M. and etc. Mejerxol`d i xudozhniki [Meyerhold and artists]. Moscow, Galart, 1995, 360 p.
  11. Bibler V.S. My`shlenie kak tvorchestvo (Vvedenie v logiku my`slennogo dialoga) [Thinking as creativity (Introduction to the logic of mental dialogue)]. Moscow, Politizdat, 1975, 399 p.
  12. Lappo-Danilevskij A.S. Metodologiya istorii [Methodology of History]. Moscow, 2006, 472 p.
  13. Lappo-Danilevskij A.S. Metodologiya istorii. V 2-x t [Methodology of History]. Vol. 1, Moscow, 2010, 408 p.
  14. Volchok Yu.P. Iskusstvo i otvetstvennost` v arxitekture: ritm i stroj e`poxi sovetskogo avangarda. Otkry`ty`j final. V knige AVANGARDSTROJ. Arxitekturny`j ritm revolyucii 1917 goda = AVNGARDSTROI. Architectural rhythm of the 1917 revolution [Art and responsibility in architecture: the rhythm and structure of the era of the Soviet avant-garde. Open final]. Moscow, 2018.
  15. Krasnaya kniga kul`tury`? Red Book of Culture? Akademiya nauk SSSR. Nauchny`j Sovet po filosofskim i social`ny`m problemam nauki i texniki. Centr nauk o cheloveke. Izdanie podgotovil: d.fil.nauk V.L. Rabinovich; otv.redaktor: akademik I.T. Frolov [Red Book of Culture?]. Moscow, 1989, 423 p.

For citation

Volchok Y. Diversity of Ideas about the «Modernity» Concept in Domestic Architecture of the 20-21st Centuries. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2018, no. 4(45), pp. 55-66. Available at: http://marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2018/4kvart18/03_volchok/index.php