ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÇÎËÎÒÀß ÌÅÄÀËÜ ÌÀÐÕÈ 2023
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2023/2024 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
ÊÎÍÊÓÐÑ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
Êðàòêîñðî÷íûå ïîäãîòîâèòåëüíûå êóðñû 1.5 ìåñÿöà
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÓÍÈÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒÑÊÈÅ ÑÓÁÁÎÒÛ
Âñåìèðíûé ôåñòèâàëü ìîëîä¸æè 2024
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

3(56) 2021


Article RURAL SETTLEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT: STATE OF THE PROBLEM, METHODOLOGY
AuthorsF. Korshakov, P. Zhuk
Moscow Architectural Institute (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
AbstractRural settlements environmental sustainability assessment is an important problem from the point of view of both state authorities and residents of these settlements. However, to increase the effectiveness of such an assessment, it is important to evaluate not only existing settlements, but also to take into account the maximum number of criteria at the stage of planning. It is necessary to evaluate the existing experience from a scientific, methodological and practical point of view, as well as coordinate the indicator systems with the parameters of territorial development, the assessment of urban environment (at the level of blocks and neighborhoods), as well as individual complexes and buildings. This paper discusses aspects of the methodology for assessing sustainability at the level of planning projects and individual complexes, as well as the problems of the significance of indicators for rural settlements, taking into account international experience.
Keywords: environmental sustainability assessment, rural settlements, environmental sustainability criteria system
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Shubenkov M., Shubenkova M. Modern City as an Anthropogenic and Natural System. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 4(53), pp. 182‒190. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/4kvart20/PDF/11_shubenkov.pdf
  2. Telichenko V.I., Benuzh A.A. Sovershenstvovanie printsipov ustiychivogo razvitija na osnove opyta primenenija “zeljenyh” standartov pri stroitel’stve olimpiyskih ob’ektov v Sochi [Improving sustainable development based on the experience of applying "green" standards in the construction of Olympic objects in Sochi]. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo, 2014, no. 10, pp. 40‒43.
  3. Tabunschikov Ju.A., Akiev R.S., Shilkin N.V., Kapko D.V. Stadion «Kazan Arena»: klass «Serebro» v sisteme sertifikatsii «RUSO. Futbol’nye stadiony» [Kazan Arena stadium: Silver class in the RUSO]. ABOK: ventiljatsija, otoplenie, konditsionirovanie vozduha, teplosnabzhenie I stroitel’naja fizika, 2017, no. 4, pp. 4‒17.
  4. Rudolphi A. Nachhaltigkeitsstandards in Deutschland und internationale Adaption. Konferenz Green Building – nachhaltig und innovativ Bauen. Berlin, 2012, 24 p.
  5. Economist Intelligence Unit: German Green City Index. Analyse der Leistungen zwölf deutscher Großstädte im Bereich Umwelt- und Klimaschutz. München, Siemens AG, 2011, p. 67.
  6. Anders S. Gebäudezertifizierung: Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Stadtquartieren: Zertifizierungssysteme als Planungs- und Kommunikationswerkzeuge Green Building, Nachhaltig Planen, Bauen und Betreiben, 2012, pp. 10–17.
  7. Infante-Barona S. Nachhaltige Städte. Modellierung und Bewertung energiebedingter Umwelteinwirkungen auf lokaler Ebene. Düren, Shaker Verlag GmbH, 2002, 153 p.
  8. Sharifi A. Murayama A. A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustaiability assessmant tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013, no. 38, pp. 73–87.
  9. Neubau Stadtquartiere: DGNB Handbuch für nachhaltiges Bauen, 2012, 509 p.
  10. Zhuk P.M., Eichner M. Structure of evidential base of systems of ecological certification and assessment of sustainability of buildings. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2013, no. 3. Available at: http://www.marhi.ru/AMIT/2013/3kvart13/zhuk/zhuk.pdf
  11. CASBEE for Urban Development. Technical Manual, 2014, 297 p.
  12. Charlot-Valdieu C., Outrequin P. Développement durable et renouvellement urbain. Des outils opérationnels pour améliorer la qualité de vie dans nos quartiers. Paris, L’Harmattan, 2007, 296 p.
  13. Gaffron Ph., Huismans G., Skala F. Ecocity book II: how to make it happen. Vienna, FacultasVerlags-und Buchhandels AG; 2008, 82 p.
  14. Il’vitskaja S.V, Lobkov V.A., Lobkova T.V. Natural’nye materialy v “zeljenoy” arhitekture [Natural Materials in “Green” Architecture]. Academia. Architecture and Construction, 2019, no. 2, pp. 130–133.
  15. Zhuk P.M. Integratsija rezultatov otsenki stroitelnyh materialov v sistemy ekologicheskoy sertifikatsii zdaniy [Data integration of building materials assessment into the systems of ecological certification of buildings]. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel’stvo, 2012, no. 9, pp. 63–65.
  16. Esaulov G.V., Blagovidova N.G., Tabunschikov Ju.A. Ustoychivoe razvitie v povestke arhitekturnogo obrazovanija [Sustainability on the Agenda of Architectural Education]. Academia. Architecture and Construction, 2020, no. 1, pp. 19–28.
  17. Zhuk P.M. Metody analiza znachimosti kriteriev v ramkah sistem otsenki ekologicheskogo stroitelstva [Methods of Analysis of Importance of Criteria within Systems of Assessment of Ecological Building]. Academia. Architecture and Construction, 2014, no. 2, pp. 109–115.
  18. Holzer P. Building Related Environmental Impacts - the Hidden Aspects. Sustainable Built Environment D-A-CH Conference, 2019, pp. 27–28.
  19. Ländliche Entwicklung in Bayern. München: Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, 2006, 135 p.

For citation

Korshakov F., Zhuk P. Rural Settlements Environmental Sustainability Assessment: State of the Problem, Methodology. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2021, no. 3(56), pp. 247–262. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2021/3kvart21/PDF/16_korshakov.pdf DOI: 10.24412/1998-4839-2021-3-247-262