ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

2(51) 2020


Article METAPHORS OF THE TEREK RIVER IN THE ARCHITECTURAL LANDSCAPE IMAGE OF VLADIKAVKAZ CITY
Authors

A. Rusanova, N. Lazareva, D. Gabalova
Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia

AbstractThe article deals with the problems of the existence of the Terek river in the urban fabric of modern Vladikavkaz. The analysis of the historical experience of the city's formation and the study of the master plan of its development planned for execution until 2025 served as the basis for identifying the principles and techniques of design in the architectural and landscape context of Vladikavkaz. The Terek river – legendary, sung in brilliant works of art, directs the authors to determine the specifics of metaphorical analogies based on the comparison of the actions of the elements of the Terek river, selected by the famous poetic work of M.Yu. Lermontov, and correspondences to these actions in the conceptual programs of architectural and landscape compositions proposed for design on the coastal territories of Vladikavkaz. The metaphorical interpretation of the images of the Terek river is the basis of the proposed method of renovation of the relationships between the architectural and landscape framework and the urban planning ensemble of the city of Vladikavkaz.
Keywords: landscape architecture, architectural and urban renovation, river in the context of the city, the organization of the coastal territories, architectural and landscape component
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Krasilnikova E.E., Layidzh D.S. Vliyanie vysotnykh dominant na strukturu gorodskogo landshafta [Influence of high-rise dominants on the structure of the urban landscape. Innovation and investment]. 2019, no. 3, pp. 209–212.
  2. Abdullaeva S.M. Modeli obnovleniya obemno-prostranstvennykh kompozitsionnykh elementov pribrezhnykh gorodov reki Kury (Azerbaydzhan) [The models of the volumetric solution of main compositional elements of the coastal towns of the river Kur (Azerbaijan). Academic Bulletin]. 2003, no. 2, pp. 17–20.
  3. Romanova E.A. Osnovnye tendentsii gradostroitel'stva sovremennykh gorodov i ikh neobkhodimost' primeneniya k g. Vladikavkaz [The main trends in urban development of modern cities and their need to apply to the city of Vladikavkaz. Magazine Internauka]. 2019, no. 46–1(128), pp. 10–12.
  4. Kadzaeva O.E. Landshaftno-ekologicheskoe proektirovanie g. Vladikavkaz [Landscape and environmental design of Vladikavkaz. Magazine Current Trends in the Development of Science and Technology]. 2016, no. 4–3, pp. 102–104.
  5. Tavasiev V.Kh., Tavasiev G.V. Sotsialno-ekologicheskie problemy v Respublike Severnaya Osetiya-Alaniya [Social and environmental problems in the Republic of North Ossetia-Alania. University Bulletin]. 2015, no. 8, pp. 233–238.
  6. Besolov V.B. Arkhitektura i gradostroitel'stvo Vladikavkaza v kontekste strategii effektivnogo razvitiya. Sovremennye problemy istorii i teorii arkhitektury. [Architecture and urban planning of Vladikavkaz in the context of effective development strategy. Modern problems of history and theory of architecture. Proceedings of scientific conferences III]. Saint Petersburg, 2017, pp. 186–213.
  7. Yankovskaya Y.S., Andreeva Y.K. Kostroma ‑ Formation of Town-Planning Identity: City and Rivers, History and Contemporaneity. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2018, no. 4(45), pp. 314–328. Available at: http://marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2018/4kvart18/22_jankovskaja/index.php
  8. Mikhaylova M.V., Mikhaylov B.P., Kaufman S.A. Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury. Arkhitektura antichnogo mira (Gretsiya i Rim) [General history of architecture. Volume II. Architecture of the ancient world (Greece and Rome)]. Moscow, 1973, p. 9.
  9. Savelyev M.V. Printsipy formirovaniya gorodskikh obshchestvennykh rekreatsionnykh zon naberezhnykh territoriy [Principles of formation of urban public recreational zones of embankment territories. Bulletin of Tomsk state University]. 2019, no. 33, p. 174.
  10. Ivanchuk A.S. Integrirovannaya klassifikatsiya sovremennykh gorodskikh naberezhnykh [Integrated classification of modern city embankments. New ideas of the new century: proceedings of the international scientific conference of FAD TOGU. Volume I]. Khabarovsk, 2015, pp. 135–142.
  11. Enyutina E.D. Osobennosti khudozhestvennogo podkhoda k formirovaniyu gorodskoy sredy. Avtoref. dis. na soisk. uchenoy stepeni kand. Arkhitektury [Features of the artistic approach to the formation of the urban environment (Cand. Dis)]. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2015, 21 p.
  12. Kureneva N.A. Pamyatniki prirody Moskvy: metodologiya, opredeleniya, fiksatsii i funktsionirovaniya [Natural monuments of Moscow: methodology, definitions, fixing and functioning (Cand. Dis)]. Moscow, 2004, pp. 8–9.
  13. Dzutsev Kh.V. Obshchestvennoe mnenie gorozhan o sovremennoy infrastrukture g. Vladikavkaza [ Public opinion of citizens about the modern infrastructure of Vladikavkaz : Monograph]. Vladikavkaz, 2018, 198 p.

For citation

Rusanova A., Lazareva N., Gabalova D. Metaphors of the Terek River in the Architectural Landscape Image of Vladikavkaz City. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 2(51), pp. 237–254. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/2kvart20/PDF/13_gabalova.pdf
DOI:
10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15113