ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

4(49) 2019


ArticleURBAN VOICES AS A COMPONENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENVIRONMENT HUMANIZATION
Authors M. Sokolova, K. Alexandrova, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract Today, urban voids are losing the role of the environmental framework, and residential development is a comfortable measure of density. Historically, voids are an integral component of urban environments and architectural monuments, they are more stable in time than architecture, provide a spatially visual variety of the environment, and form the psychological and emotional comfort of residents. The range of urban voids covers various spatial levels from the urban environment to a separate architectural unit - a building. The sought-after is a balanced combination of mass and void, blurred borders and permeability of the architectural mass, which creates a variety of environmental interactions between citizens and the potential for further development of architecture.
Keywords: spatial voids, gap, porosity, measure of the density of the architectural mass, comfortable urban environment
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Lebedev V.V. Zametki o prostranstvennoj i jesteticheskoj sushhnosti arhitektury. Nauchnoe izdanie [Notes on the spatial and aesthetic essence of architecture. Scientific publication]. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1994, 256 p.
  2. Krasheninnikov I.A. Prospects for the analysis of "porosity" of urban fabric. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2017, no 3(40), ðð. 215-226. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2017/3kvart17/PDF/16_krasheninninkov.pdf
  3. Dutsev M.V. Koncepcija promezhutka v sovremennoj arhitekture. Privolzhskij nauchnyj zhurnal [The concept of the gap in modern architecture. Volga Scientific Journal]. N. Novgorod, Nizhegor. state architecture.-builds. un-t, 2010, no 1, ðð. 122-127.
  4. Teresa Stoppani. Relational Architecture: Dense Voids and Violent Laughters. Field-journal. 2016, no 7, vol.2 (1). Available at: http://field-journal.org/wpcontent/uploads/ 2016/07/Relational-Architecture-Dense-Voids-and-Violent-Laughters-Stoppani.pdf
  5. Sipkin P.A. The body concept in the architecture of public buildings of Rem Kulhaas. Architecture and Modem Information Technologies, 2014, no. 1(26). Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2014/1kvart14/sipkin/sipkin.pdf
  6. Massimo Tadi, Laura Brioschi, Carlo Biraghi, M. Hadi Mohammad Zadeh. Urban Porosity. A morphological Key Category for the optimization of the CAS’s environmental and energy performance. Journal of Engineering Technology. 2017, no 4(3):138 August. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319350444_Urban_Porosity_A_morphological_Key_Category_for_the_optimization_of_the_CAS's_environmental_and_energy_performance
  7. Petrovskaya E.I., Podobulkin A.G., Pechenkin I.A., Mavlyonkin A.I. About the encoding method of a “pedestrian-comfortable” urban environment and a combination of centric and linear urban spaces. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2018, no. 3 (44), pð. 392-426. Available at: http://marhi.ru/AMIT/2018/3kvart18/24_petrovskaya/index.php
  8. Kozlova L.V. Granica kak metod ozhivlenija gorodskogo prostranstva. Vestnik Ir GTU [Border as a method of revitalizing urban space. Bulletin of Irkutsk State Technical University]. 2014, no. 6 (89), pp. 117-123.
  9. Kiyanenko K.V. Uroki arhitektury Germana Hertcbergera. Arhitekturnyj Bestnik [Hermann Hertzberger Architecture Lessons. Architectural Bulletin]. 2010, no. 5(116).
  10. Goloukhova D.V. Osobennosti prostranstvennoj struktury sovremennoj Moskvy. Vestnik Universiteta MGIMO [Features of the spatial structure of modern Moscow. Bulletin of the University of MGIMO]. 2015, pp. 141-149.
  11. Krasheninnikov A.V. Microspaces of built environment. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2014, no. 4(39). Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2014/4kvart14/krasheninnikov/krasheninnikov.pdf
  12. Krasheninnikov A.V. Mezzo-spaces of in built environment. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2015, no. 4(33). Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2015/4kvart15/krash/krash.pdf
  13. Krasheninnikov A.V. Macro-spaces of built environment. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2016, no. 3(36). Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2016/3kvart16/krasheninnikov/AMIT_36_krasheninnikov.pdf

For citation

Sokolova M., Alexandrova K. Urban Voices as a Component of Architectural Environment Humanization. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2019, no. 4(49), pp. 262-280. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2019/4kvart19/PDF/17_sokolova.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2019-00018