ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

2(47) 2019


ArticleSPATIAL COMPOSITION AND MODERN DYNAMIC ARCHITECTURE
AuthorsE. Lapshina1, E. Vechkasova1
1
Penza State University of Architecture and Construction, Penza, Russia
AbstractThe article is devoted to the actual aspects of teaching composition in architectural universities and its use in the practice of modern educational and professional architectural design. The author's view on the problem is presented. The main distinctive features of the kinetic composition and the ways of its formation, revealing its artistic and aesthetic potential and development prospects in the context of modern dynamic architecture are shown.
Keywords: architectural composition, architectural education, dynamic architecture, professional design, kinematics
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Bogomolov I.I. Semiotika I osvoenie professionalnogo yazika v architecture [Semiotics and the development of professional language in architecture. Architectural and artistic composition: Sb.scientific-methodical.tr. Under the editorship of V. I. Iovlev]. Ekaterinburg, Architecton, 2004, 253 p.
  2. Vazovtsev D. V. Suprematicheskaya architekturnaya model, object prostranstvennogo suprematisma K.S.Malevicha [Suprematist architectural model, the object spatial Suprematism Malevich]. Available at: https://w.histrf.ru/articles/article/show/arkhitiekton
  3. Dadasheva M.M. Hudozhestvennyj jazyk arhitektury konca ÕÕ nachala ÕÕI veka v kategorijah obemno-prostranstvennoj kompozicii [Artistic language of architecture of the late XX – early XXI century in the categories of spatial composition (Cand. Dis)]. Moscow, 2016.
  4. Ikonnikov A.V. Funcziya, forma, obraz v architecture [Function, form, image in architecture]. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1986, 288 p.
  5. Koleychuk V.F. Kinetizm [Kinetics]. Moscow, Galart, 1994,154 p.
  6. Lapshina E.G. Dinamicheskie svoystva architecturnogo prostranstva [Dynamic properties of architectural space]. Penza, 2014, 188 p.
  7. Malakhov S.A. Kompozicionniy metod architekturnogo proektirovaniya [Compositional method of architectural design (Doc. Dis)]. Nizhny Novgorod, NNGASU, 2018, 48 p.
  8. Malevich K.S. Suprematizm. Mir kak bespredmetnosty ili vechniy pokoi. T3 [Suprematism. The world as pointlessness, or Eternal rest. Vol.3]. Vitebsk, 1922. Available at: http://www.k-malevich.ru/works/tom3/index1.html
  9. Melodinsky D.L. Artistic practice of parametric architecture: raptures and disappointments. Architecture and modern information technologies. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2017/4kvart17/PDF/01_melodinskij.pdf
  10. Raccine N.G., Savel'ev M.A. Granizy architekturnogo prostranstva: sposobi modelirovaniya v uchebnom prozesse. Prizipy formirovaniya regionalnyh architecturnyh shkol: sb.nauch.st. [The Boundaries of the architectural space: the simulation methods in the educational process. the Principles of regional architectural schools: Sb.scientific.papers. E. G. Lapshina (ed.), etc]. Penza, 2003, pp. 127-133.
  11. Florensky P.A. Analiz prostranstvennosty I vremeni v hudojestvennyh izobrazitelnyh proizvedeniyah [Analysis of spatiality and time in artistic and visual works]. Moscow, Progress, 1993, 324 p. 

For citation

Lapshina E., Vechkasova E. Spatial Composition and Modern Dynamic Architecture. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2019, no. 2(47), pp. 359-371. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2019/2kvart19/PDF/24_lapshina.pdf