ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÇÎËÎÒÀß ÌÅÄÀËÜ ÌÀÐÕÈ 2023
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2023/2024 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
ÊÎÍÊÓÐÑ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
Êðàòêîñðî÷íûå ïîäãîòîâèòåëüíûå êóðñû 1.5 ìåñÿöà
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÓÍÈÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒÑÊÈÅ ÑÓÁÁÎÒÛ
Âñåìèðíûé ôåñòèâàëü ìîëîä¸æè 2024
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

3(44) 2018


Article ABOUT THE METHODS OF DESIGN SIMULATION IN ARCHITECTURE. TO THE QUESTION STATEMENT
Authors

O. Yawein, T. Vakhitov , Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia

Abstract This article’s aim is raising a question of project modelling and revealing methods of project modelling in architecture – subject area of architectural research, which is mostly undisclosed and uncertain already in its initial concepts. The work is based on O. Yawein’s hypothesis of peculiar role of architectural transformations, also functioning as models and generators of architectural solutions. Those transformations may be discovered both by visual analysis and by viewing the drawing graphics. Certain objects, types and areas of project modelling are established in this article. Special attention is given to deliberately researched methods of project modelling of pioneers of Russian constructivism – Vesnin brothers, Moisei Ginsburg, Ilya Golosov and Alexander Nikolskiy, which are studied by T. Vakhitov. Admissions, means and operations, such as geometric formation, functional schemes and axis systems projections and their connection with general architectural solution are analysed in the article. It’s also shown how certain masters of architecture use those admissions, means and operations to construct their own architectural systems, on which the very methods are based.
Keywords: model, modelling, modelling system, structure, method, functional zones, drawing graphics, plan, grid, projection
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Arnhejm R. Dinamika arhitekturnyh form [The Dynamics of architectural form]. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1981, 189 p.
  2. Barhin B.G. Metodika Arhitekturnogo proektirovaniya [Architectural design methodology]. Moscow, Strojizdat, 1993, 225 p.
  3. Bokov A.V. Geometricheskie osnovaniya arhitektury v kartine mira (avtoref. kand. dis.)   [Geometric foundations of architecture in the picture of the world (Cand. Dis. Thesis)]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 12-13.
  4. Brunov N.I. Ocherki po istorii arhitektury. Tom vtoroj [Essays on the history of architecture. Volume 2]. Moscow, Leningrad, Akademiya, 1935, 621 p.
  5. Vahitov T.R. Functional Method and M. Gingburg’s Architectural Design System. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2016, no. 4(37), pp. 68-77. Available at: http://marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2016/4kvart16/Vakhitov/untitled.php
  6. Vahitov T.R. Proektnaya sistema brat'ev Vesninyh. Aktual'nye problemy arhitektury i dizajna.  Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii [Project system of the Vesnin brothers. Actual problems of architecture and design. Materials of the all-Russian scientific conference]. Ekaterinburg, 2017.
  7. Zejtun Zh. Organizaciya vnutrennej struktury proektiruemyh arhitekturnyh system [Organization of the internal structure of the designed architectural systems]. Moscow, Strojizdat, 1984, 160 p.
  8. Lotman Yu.M. Lekcii po struktural'noj poehtike [Lectures on structural poetics. In the collection of Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow semiotic school]. Moscow, 1994, 548 p, P. 51.
  9. Pavlov N.L. Altar'. Stupa. Hram. Arhaicheskoe mirozdanie v arhitekture indoevropejcev.  Ìonografija [Altar. Stupa. Temple. Archaic universe in the architecture of the Indo-Europeans. The monograph]. Moscow, Olma-Press, 2001, 368 p.
  10. Panofskij EH. Goticheskaya arhitektura i skholastika [Gothic architecture and scholasticism. In the book Perspective as a "symbolic form"; Gothic architecture and scholasticism]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika, 2004, 334 p.
  11. Yàvejn O.I. Problema prostranstvennyh granic v arhitekture (Kand. dis.) [The problem of spatial boundaries in architecture (Cand. Dis)]. Moscow, 1980, 244 p.
  12. Yàvejn O.I. O svojstvah prostranstva kak "materiala arhitektury" v teoreticheskom nasledii N.A. Ladovskogo. Prostranstvo VHUTEMAS: Nasledie. Tradicii. Novacii. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii [On the properties of space as "the material of architecture" in the theoretical heritage Of N. Ah. Ladovsky. Space VHUTEMAS: Legacy. Traditions. Innovations. Materials of the all-Russian scientific conference]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 48-50.
  13. Yàkushina A.B. Preobrazovaniya linejnyh i ploskostnyh ehlementov v prostranstvennyh postroeniyah masterov russkogo avangarda (Kand. dis.) [Transformations of linear and planar elements in spatial constructions of Russian avant-garde artists (Cand. Dis)]. Moscow, 2015, 161 p.
  14. Alexander C., Manheim Marvin L. The Use of Diagrams in Highway Route Location: An Experiment. School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1962, 119 p.
  15. Alexander C. The Nature of Order: The phenomenon of life. Center for Environmental Structure, 2002, 476 p.
  16. Batty M. Urban Modelling: algorithms, calibrations, predictions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976, 406 p.
  17. Eisenman P. Diagram Diaries. Universe, 1999, 240 p.
  18. Hillier B. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015, 370 p.
  19. Terzidis K. Algorithmic Architecture. Routledge, 2006, 176 p.

For citation

Yawein O., Vakhitov T. About the Methods of Design Simulation in Architecture. To the Question Statement. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2018, no. 3(44), pp. 60-72. Available at: http://marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2018/3kvart18/03_yavein_vakhitov/index.php