ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

4(41) 2017


Article THE STRUCTURE OF ARCHITECTURAL REVOLUTIONS
Authors D. Danilov, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov, Saratov, Russia
AbstractIn the second half of XX century, postpositivism becomes one of the most influential schools of the philosophy of science. Exponents of postpositivism have introduced the terms "paradigm" and "scientific rationality". According to the postpostitivism development of science in history is a sequence of successive «paradigms», «scientific rationalities» or «research programs». The development of the architecture is a sequence of architectural styles, however, the mechanism of change and the formation of architectural styles is not evident. The basis of this article is the hypothesis that architecture and science evolve according to similar principles, which allows us to apply the methodology of postpositivism to the architecture.
Keywords: architectural style, development of architecture, autopiesis of architecture, postpositivism, Thomas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnyh revolutsiy [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow, 2009, 310 p.
  2. Lakatos I. Falsifikatsiya I metodologiya nauchno-issledovatelskih programm [The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes]. Moscow, 1995, 235 p.
  3. Luhmann N. Sotsialnye sistemy. Ocherk obschey teorii [Introduction to the Theory of Society]. Saint-Petersburg, 2007, 648 p.
  4. Stepin V. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya. :Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kultura [Classics, non-classical, post-non-classical: criteria of discrimination. Post-Classics: Philosophy, Science, Culture]. Saint-Petersburg, 2009, pp. 249-295.
  5. Schumacher P. The Autopoiesis of architecture, vol.1. A new framework for architecture. United Kingdom, London, Willey & Sons, 2011, 498 p.
  6. Schumacher P. The Autopoiesis of architecture, vol.2. A new agenda for architecture. United Kingdom, London, Willey & Sons, 2012, 715 p.

For citation

Danilov D. The Structure of Architectural Revolutions. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2017, no. 4(41), pp. 35-43. Available at: http://marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2017/4kvart17/03_danilov/index.php