-       XX-XXI »
,      2020


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL

2(39) 2017


ArticlePremises and Advisability OF THE FORMER INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS USE
Authors K. Dudnikova, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract

The article presents a hypothesis of dissertation research to conversion of industrial buildings for mixed-use housing, which performs on the example of buildings of the Vologda city. The first part of the article reveals several reasons to emancipation of industrial buildings of the city center. The author summarizes the historical experience to conversion of industrial buildings, which characterizes the city in United States and Western Europe (New York, Manchester, Hamburg). The second part of the article contains analysis of the factors of use of former industrial buildings for mixed-use housing (urban planning, structural, environmental, economic, social, aesthetic).

Keywords: conversion of industrial building, mixed-use housing in New York, Manchester, Hamburg
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Afanas'ev K. Dzhentrifikatsiya i reindustrializatsiya v razvitii gorodskoj territorii [Gentrification and re-industrialization in the urban development. Magazine «Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A. S. Pushkina»]. 2014, no. 2, . 48-60.
  2. Zukin S. Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins, 1982, 212 p.
  3. Ot redaktora: Opyt samozakhvata [From editor: squatting experience. Magazine Project RUSSIA]. 2006, no. 40, . 58-59.
  4. Ryabov N. rkhitekturnyj aspekt Serebryanoj fabriki E. Uorkhola [Architectural aspect of Silver factory of A. Warhol]. Izvestiya KGASU, 2014, 4(30), 83-92 .
  5. History of Soho - New York, NY. Available at: http://www.soho-lofts.com/soho-history.html/
  6. Mengüşoğlu, N. Reuse of industrial built heritage for residential purposes in Manchester. METU JFA, 2013, 1. Available at: http://jfa.arch.metu.edu.tr/archive/0258-5316/2013/cilt30/sayi_1/117-138.pdf
  7. Cherkasov G. London, Gamburg. Neispol'zovannye vozmozhnosti arkhitektury [London, Hamburg. Open chances of architecture. Magazine Academia]. 2013, no. 3, pp. 27-40.
  8. Belousova A. Vzlety i padeniya Elbphilharmonie [Ups and downs of Elbphilharmonie. Magazine Project international]. 2013, no. 35, pp. 138-141.
  9. Glotova S. Revisited the ability of conversed industrial objects to conform the criterions of modern residential architecture. AMIT : Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2010, 3(12). Available at: http://www.marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2010/3kvart10/glotova/abstract.php
  10. Shipley R. Does adaptive reuse pay? A study of the business of building renovation in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2006, V. 12, no. 6, pp. 505-520.
  11. Truhanov S. Ofis vmesto mel'nicy: chto nuzhno znat' o redevelopmente s arhitekturnoj tochki zreniya [Office instead of mill: what do you need to know about redevelopment from architectural point of view]. Available at: http://realty.rbc.ru/experts/04/08/2015/562949996443540.shtml/
  12. Ginsburg M. Novye metody arkhitekturnogo myshleniya [New methods of architectural thinking. Magazine Sovremennaya arkhitektura].1926, no. 1, pp. 1-3.