MODERN ARCHITECTURE AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS OF RELIGIOUS ART

A.K. Solovyov, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University), Moscow, Russia
K.A. Solovyov, FGBOU VO Moscow State Stroganov Academy, Moscow, Russia, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University), Moscow, Russia

The article discusses the architectural and artistic understanding of the construction of Orthodox churches in the Russian Federation. Raises the problem of interaction of clients and architects in the design of new places of worship. Discusses important problems of modern religious architecture. The most important problem of modern religious architecture is the issue of the use of new construction materials, the need of connecting the traditional religious architecture with modern architectural design solutions. It is noted that the big problem is the architecture itself is constructed of modern religious buildings can often be characterized as an appeal to the architectural traditions of the past, as well as a very large of different quality to the nature of constructed facilities, from the authentic architectural structures to the primitive churches that were built without any project.

1. Belkin A.N. Istorija i sovremennost' v arhitekture pravoslavnogo hrama. Zhurnal Nauchnoe obozrenie [History and modernity in architecture of the Orthodox Church. Magazine “Scientific review”]. Moscow, 2015, no. 8, pp. 164-168.
2. Belkin A.N. Perspektivnoe napravlenie razvitie gradostroitel'noj kul'tury v Rossii [A promising direction of development of urban culture in Russia. Magazine “Bulletin of Moscow state forest University - Forest Herald”]. Moscow, 2015, no. 5, pp. 17-22.
3. Buseva-Davydova I.L. K probleme kanona v pravoslavnom hramostroenii [To the problem of the Canon in the Orthodox gramotron. Magazine “Christian architecture”. New materials and research]. Moscow, 2004.
4. Riding E.Y. Kanon v arhitekture pravoslavnogo hrama [Canon in the architecture of the Orthodox Church. Magazine “The Academic Bulletin of the Ural Sri project RAABS”]. 2010, no. 4, pp. 1-3.
5. Kudryavtsev M., Kudryavtseva T. [Russian Orthodox Church. The symbolic language of architectural forms To Light]. 1991, no. 17, P. 65.
6. Mokeev G.I. Nebesnyj grad [The heavenly city". "Moscow – 850 years". "Moscow textbooks"]. Moscow, 1996, Vol. I.
7. Prima redaction consummate a reverendis mine patribus virisque in hire canonico necnon tota in Latinate peritis recognoscenda: the Code of Canonical law, promulgated by authority of Pope John Paul II. Book IV. The Ministry of sanctification in the Church. Cannes. 834-1253. Available at: http://www.agnuz.info
8. Solovyov K. A. Uspenskij kafedral'nyj sobor goroda Dmitrova - 500 let istorii [Uspensky Cathedral of Dmitrov - 500 years of history. Magazine “Bulletin of Moscow State regional University”]. Moscow, 2013, no. 3, pp. 1-11.
9. Solovyov K.A. Burlyaev I.N. Novoe stroitel'stvo i rekonstrukcija pravoslavnyh hramov Moskvy i arhitekturno-konstruktivnye reshenija [New construction and reconstruction of Orthodox churches of Moscow and architectural-construction solutions /the Days of student science – a collection of reports of scientific-technical conference on the results of scientific research works of students of the Institute of construction and architecture. The UNIVERSITY 14-18 March]. 2016, Moscow, 2016, P. 14.
10. Solovyov K. A. Spasskij Na Ugre monastyr' – istoricheskie predanija i arhitektura [Spassky monastery on the Ugra – historical tradition and architecture. Magazine “Bulletin of Bryansk state University”]. 2016, no. 1(27).
11. Ouspensky L.A. Bogoslovie ikony Russkoj Pravoslavnoj cerkvi [Theology of the icon of the Russian Orthodox Church]. Pereslavl, 1997.
12. Shamarov A.A. Russkoe cerkovnoe zodchestvo: simvolika i istoki [Russian Church architecture: the symbolism and origins]. Moscow, 1988.
13. Schenkov A.S. Problemy tradicionnoj formy v sovremennom hramostroenii Rossii [Problems of traditional forms in contemporary gramotron Russia. Temple construction in Russia. Tradition and modernity. Abstracts]. Moscow, 1996.