-       XX-XXI »
,      2020
 / English site / AMIT / 2016 / 1kvart16 / titova

1(34) 2016


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article SYSTEM OF VALUABLE CRITERIA OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS IN MOSCOW
Authors L. Titova, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract The article covers several basic systematic approaches of evaluation criteria of cultural heritage. Having analyzed the processes of identifying architectural monuments in Russia and the rest of the world, the author concludes that the quality of expert reviews directly influences the character of the architectural conversion. Contemporary practice of documentation mainly describes tangible elements of buildings, and as a result objects of industrial heritage lose their initial uniqueness. Therefore, such conceptual subtle matters as authenticity, complexity, integrity, social memory and genius loci do not become in focus of monument preservation.
Keywords: architectural monument, industrial heritage, object of protection, system of valuable criteria, DoCoMoMo, spirit of the place, social memory, authenticity
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. Federalnyy zakon ot 25.06.2002 N 73-FZ [Federal Law of 25.06.2002 N 73-FZ (ed. by 07.13.2015) "On objects of cultural heritage (historical and cultural monuments) of the Russian Federation". Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, Issue number 26, St.2519]. Moscow, 2002.
  2. Glazichev V.L., Egorov M.M., Ilyina T.V. Gorodskaya sreda [Urban environment. Technology development: handbook]. Moscow, 1995, p. 13.
  3. Kulish V.O. Promyshlennoye naslediye: rol i mesto v gorode [Industrial heritage: the role and place in the city. Abstracts of I International scientific and practical congress of the urban environment - XXI CENTURY. Architecture. Construction. Design]. Kyiv, 2014, p. 367.
  4. Nikulina E.G. Tsennostnaya differentsiatsiya istoricheskoy zastroyki Moskvy [Value differentiation of historic buildings in Moscow. ICOMOS National Committee "Monuments and sites Russia"]. ICOMOS, 1996, p. 267.
  5. Solovieva E.E. Metodicheskiye ukazaniya po provedeniyu kompleksnykh istoriko-kulturnykh issledovaniy [Methodical guidelines for implementation of complex historical and cultural studies. State Unitary Enterprise "Scientific Research and Design Institute of the Master Plan of Moscow"]. Moscow, 2009.
  6. Stiglitz M.S. Problema okhrany pamyatnikov promyshlennoy arkhitektury Sankt-Peterburga [The problem of protection of monuments of industrial architecture of St. Petersburg. Science, education and experimental design: Abstracts of the international scientific conference of the faculty, students and young scientists]. Moscow, Moscow Institute of Architecture, 2015, p. 563-565.
  7. A FUTURE FOR MILLS / Principles for dealing with heritage mills / Cultural Heritage Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of Nederland. Available at: http://publicaties.cultureelerfgoed.nl/sites/default/files/publications/a- future-for-mills.pdf
  8. DOCOMOMO / Full documentation fiche 2003. Available at: http://www.archi.fr/DOCOMOMO/PDF/pdffl.pdf
  9. DUBLIN PRINCIPLES: Joint ICOMOS - TICCIH Principles for the Conservation of Industrial Heritage Sites, Structures, Areas and Landscapes. Available at: http://ticcih.org/about/about-ticcih/dublin-principles/