ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ

special 2015


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article SOME QUESTIONS OF DOMESTIC THEORY OF URBAN
Authors M. Shubenkov, M. Shubenkova, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract The article discusses the current state and prospects of development of the domestic theory of urban planning The primary role of town planning is to find solutions to problems of systemic organization of space. Urban planning science designed to solve the problems of the development of theoretical and design fundamentals research, forecasting systems and advanced space management. Basic and applied scientific research and developments in modern conditions require extended range of problems to be solved, the changing nature of professional thinking, develop a fundamentally new approach to the studied phenomena as quantitative accumulation of knowledge and traditional techniques for solving problems is no longer enough, and current problems are too complex. Today, the development of the national urban planning needs to develop a comprehensive methodology that provides justification in the project process from scientific positions most efficient schemes of spatial distribution of land-use industry.
Keywords: The theory of urban development, methodology, applied and basic research, crisis theory of urban planning
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. Vil'ner M.Ja. Gradostroitel'naja politika v svete problem upravlenija territorij. Sbornik statej Istoriko-kul'turnoe nasledie kak osobyj resurs regiona i faktor ego social'nojekonomicheskogo razvitija [Urban planning policy in the light of problems of management of territories]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, 2009, ðð. 24-45.
  2. Glazychev V.L. Social'no-jekologicheskaja interpretacija gorodskoj sredy [Socio-ecological interpretation of the urban environment]. Moscow, 1984, 180 ð.
  3. Martin Dzh. Telematicheskoe obshhestvo. Vyzov blizhajshego budushhego / Novaja tehnokraticheskaja volna na Zapade [Telematic society. The challenge of the near future]. Moscow, 1986. Ð. 192.
  4. Mitjagin S.D. Gradostroitel'stvo kak instrument social'no-jekonomicheskogo razvitija Rossii. Rossija, Tret'e tysjacheletie [The urban planning as a tool for socio-economic development of Russia. Russia, Third Millennium. Magazine «Vestnik aktual'nyh prognozov»]. No. 8, 2003, T. 1, pp. 148-159.
  5. Smoljar I.M. Nacional'naja doktrina gradostroitel'stva Rossii. Koncepcija gradostroitel'noj politiki Rossii na nachalo ÕÕI veka [National doctrine of urban planning of Russia. The concept of town-planning policy of Russia at the beginning of the XXI century]. Moscow, 2001, 95 p.
  6. Smoljar I.M. Principy gradostroitel'nogo proektirovanija i predlozhenija po razrabotke general'nyh planov gorodov v novyh social'no-jekonomicheskih uslovijah [The principles of urban design and proposals for the development of master plans of cities in the new socioeconomic conditions]. Moscow, 1995, 86 p.
  7. Sassen S. Kogda goroda znachat bol'she, chem gosudarstva [When cities mean more than the state Magazine “The New Times”]. No. 43, 2003, pp. 44-62.
  8. Trutnev Je.K.Gradoregulirovanie v uslovijah rynochnoj jekonomiki: ucheb. posobie [Grado regulation in a market economy ]. Moscow, 2009, 248 p.
  9. Trubina E.G. Gorod v teorii. Opyt osmyslenija prostranstva [The city in theory. The experience of understanding the space]. Moscow, 2011, 520 p.
  10. Tofler Je. Shok budushhego [The shock of the future]. Moscow, 2002, 557 p.
  11. Shubenkov M.V. Strukturnye zakonomernosti arhitekturnogo formoobrazovanija [Structural patterns of architectural shaping]. Moscow, 2006, 321 p.
  12. Malojan G.A. Prostranstvo rasselenija: Moskva i Moskovskaja aglomeracija – edinyj ob#ekt gradostroitel'nogo razvitija [Space settlement. Moscow and the Moscow agglomeration as a single object of urban development. Magazine “ACADEMIA”]. No. 4, 2004, pp. 32-36.
  13. Percik E.N. Geourbanistika [Geourbanistics. Magazine “ACADEMIA”]. No 3, 2009, pp. 4649.