ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

4(53) 2020


Article IMPACT OF CITY PLAN CONFIGURATION ON THE FORMATION OF A NETWORK OF CENTERS: ELEMENTS OF GRADANALYSIS
Authors

I. Sinitsyna
Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia

Abstract The problems of the center have always been the focus of attention of city planners. The idea of its location, boundaries and possible vectors of development changes with the expansion of the level of mobilization, modern technologies of remote access, as well as the formation of value assessments in modern society. New methods of analysis make it possible to trace the morphology of movement and the nature of movements, reflecting the individual characteristics of spatial structures. This creates an opportunity to determine the influence of the configuration of the plan on the shape of the center, to identify the most accessible points of the urban environment and options for the formation of sub-centers. The issues raised in this article are analyzed in this article using the example of three Russian cities.
Keywords: polycentric urban planning structure, a measure of centrality in the planning structure of a city, a hierarchical network of centers, the dynamics of the transformation of centers in an urban structure, digital data processing platforms for analyzing the configuration of an urban network and generating central nodes
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Gutnov A. E. Evoliutciia gradostroitelstva [Urban planning evolution]. Moscow, 1984, 176 p.
  2. Moisseev I. Destructurization Phantoms within a System of Urban Development Planning. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2019, no. 4(49), pp. 224–234. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2019/4kvart19/PDF/15_moisseev.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2019-00016.
  3. Resin V.I., Popkov I.S. Razvitie bolshikh gorodov v usloviiakh perekhodnoi ekonomiki : Sistemniy podkhod [Development of large cities in a transitional economy: a systematic approach]. Moscow, 2000, 326 p.
  4. Batty M., Susan E., Thurstain-Goodwin M. Town Centers: Defining Boundaries for Statistical Monitoring: Feasibility Study. Department of the Environment, transport and the Regions, 1998, no. 206, pp. 46–51.
  5. Hillier B. Centrality as a process: accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 1999, no. 4, pp. 107–127.
  6. Hillier B. Cities as movement economies. Urban Design International, 1996, no. 1(1), pp. 49–60.
  7. Hillier B., Penn A., Hanson J., Grajewski T., Xu J. Natural movement: or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 1993, vol. 20, pp. 29–66.
  8. Hillier B. Space is the Machine. Cambridge, University Press, 1996, 368 p.
  9. Karimi K. Continuity and change in old cities: an analytical investigation of the spatial structure in Iranian and English historic cities before and after modernization: PhD Thesis. University of London, 1998, pp. 405.
  10. Kozlowski J. Threshold Theory and the Sub-Regional Plan. The Town Planning Review, 1968, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 99–116.
  11. Siksna A. The effects of block size and form in North American and Australian City Centers. Urban Morphology, 1997, no. 1, pp. 19–33.

For citation

Sinitsyna I. Impact of City Plan Configuration on the Formation of a Network of Centers: Elements of Gradanalysis. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 4(53), pp. 204215. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/4kvart20/PDF/13_sinitsyna.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15313