ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

3(52) 2020


Article Spatial analyses and revitalization of small towns
Authors

A. Lebedev
Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia

Abstract The article discusses the current problems of the urban environment of small historical cities of Russia. A review is made on modern urban planning models and various types of analysis, such as: spacematrix (various types of urban networks), spacesyntax (connectivity of the road network), MIT (functional diversity model). The results of these various tools of spatial analysis can be compared with each other and with other data of urban planning analysis of the territory of settlements such as landscape-visual analysis, analysis of social connectivity and walking distance, which are the most advanced in the Russian architectural school.
Keywords: small towns, urban development model, urban environment, urban planning and design, cognitive urbanism
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Dugin A. Postphilosophia. Tri paradigmy v istorii mysli [3 paradigms of historical thing. Akademicheskij proekt]. Moscow, 2020, 504 p.
  2. Krasheninnikov A.V. Kognitivnaya urbanistika: arhetipy i prototipy gorodskoj sredy [Cognitive Urbanism: archetypes and prototypes of the urban environment]. Moscow, 2020, 210 p.
  3. Krasheninnikov A.V., Nikolaev E.D. Perspektivnye modeli publichnyh prostranstv gorodskoj sredy [The future models of public space in the built environment. Architecture and construction of Russia. Monthly scientific-practical and cultural-educational journal]. 2019, no. 1(229), pp. 34–39. Available at: http://www.asrmag.ru/1-2019/ASR-1-2019-Krasheninnikov_compressed.pdf
  4. Moiseev U., Krasheninnikov I. Sovremennye tipy zhiloj zastrojkii harakteristiki gorodskoj tkani. Uchebnoe posobie [Modern Types of Residential Buildings Characteristics of Urban Fabric: A Study Guide]. Moscow, 2020.
  5. Christopher Alexander. Yazyk Shablonov [A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction]. Moscow, 2014, 1096 p.
  6. Shchenkov A.S. Small Town of Russia. The Building Typology. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2017, no. 1(38), pp. 281–290. Available at: http://marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2017/1kvart17/shenkov/index.php
  7. Shchenkov A.S. Protection provisions of small historical towns public areas. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2019, no. 4(49), pp. 87–95. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2019/4kvart19/PDF/06_shchenkov.pdf
  8. Van Nes A. Combination of Space Syntax with Spacematrix and the Mixed Use Index. The Rotterdam South test case. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium Edited by M. Greene, J. Reyes and A. Castro. Santiago de Chile: PUC, 2012, 12 p.
  9. Lynch Kevin. The Image of the City. The M.I.T. Press Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England, 1959.
  10. Lindsay G. The New-New Urbanism. Fast Company, 2010, February, pp. 88–95.
  11. Berghauser Pont M. and Haupt P., Spacematrix – Space, Density and Urban Form. NAi Publishers, Rotterdam, 2010, 36 p.
  12. Hillier B. Space is the Machine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996, pp. 124–126.
  13. Forsyth A. Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Density. Design Brief, 8, Design Center for American Urban Landscape, University of Minesota, 2003, pp. 44–47.

For citation

Lebedev A. Spatial Analyses and Revitalization of Small Towns. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 3(52), pp. 242251. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/3kvart20/PDF/13_lebedev.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15213