ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÇÎËÎÒÀß ÌÅÄÀËÜ ÌÀÐÕÈ 2023
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2023/2024 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
ÊÎÍÊÓÐÑ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
Êðàòêîñðî÷íûå ïîäãîòîâèòåëüíûå êóðñû 1.5 ìåñÿöà
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÓÍÈÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒÑÊÈÅ ÑÓÁÁÎÒÛ
Âñåìèðíûé ôåñòèâàëü ìîëîä¸æè 2024
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

1(50) 2020


Article TWO CENTURIES of architectural EVOLUTION of the TVER EN ROUTE PALACE
Authors S. Borisov
Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract This article explores the methodological aspects of the design and reconstruction of a large residential Palace complex - Tver Travel Palace. To achieve this goal, the actual material on the history of the construction and reconstruction history of the Palace is structured in accordance with the components of the process of architectural creativity: functional and planning structure and figurative and artistic solution. Structural relationships between building elements were identified as an independent object of research for the object were considered for the first time. The use of modular metrorhythmic constructions by classical architects were analyzed by the method of conceptual apparatus and theory of spatial composition. The methods of synthesis of different-time architecture in the reconstruction of the Palace are considered. On the basis of the conducted research author's graphic sketch reconstructions were developed.
Keywords: En Route Palace, Tver, functional and planning solution, module, figurative and stylistic characteristics
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Borisova E.A. Russkaya arhitektura v epohu romantizma [Russian architecture in the era of romanticism]. St. Petersburg, "Dmitry Bulanin Publishing House", 1997, 314 p.
  2. Borisov S.V. Evropejskaya stilistika XVIII‒XIX vekov v sovremennom rossijskom hramostroenii [European stylistics of the XVIII-XIX centuries in modern Russian Church building. Bulletin of the Tomsk state University of architecture and construction]. 2014, no. 2, pp. 38–52.
  3. Borisov S.V. About the Modern Understanding of Asceticism in the Church Architecture. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2016, no. 4(41), pp. 201-218. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2017/4kvart17/PDF/15_borisov.pdf
  4. Borisov S.V. Rekonstrukciya ikonostasa domovogo hrama Tverskogo Imperatorskogo dvorca [Reconstruction of the iconostasis of the house Church of the Tver Imperial Palace. Regional architecture and construction]. 2016, no. 4(29), pp. 119–124.
  5. Borisov S.V. The Temple component of the architecture of the Tver Imperial Palace. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2017, no.1(38), pp. 53–68. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2017/1kvart17/PDF/04_AMIT_38_BORISOV_PDF.pdf
  6. Gorbatenko S.B. Tverskoj (Putevoj) dvorec. Istoricheskaya spravka [Tverskoy (Travel) Palace. Historical background. The Manuscript]. Leningrad, 1989, 207 p.
  7. Komarov B. Chertezh goroda Tveri do pereplanirovki XVIII veka [Drawing of the city of Tver before the redevelopment of the XVIII century. Architectural heritage. Vol. 6]. Moscow, State publishing house of literature on construction and architecture, 1956, pp. 150–153.
  8. Klimenko S.V. Arhitekturnaya deyatel'nost' I.F. Michurina. 1720‒1750-e gody [Architectural activity of I.F. Michurin. 1720–1750 years. The Dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of candidate of architecture]. Moscow, Moscow Institute of architecture, 2002.
  9. Pilyavsky V.I. Zodchij Rossi [Zodchiy Rossi]. Moscow – Leningrad, State publishing house of architecture and urban planning, 1951, 152 p.
  10. Raikov G.P., Cheremsky Y.Y. Imperatorskij dvorec v Tveri [Imperial Palace in Tver]. St. Petersburg, Aurora, 2015, 256 p.
  11. Salimov A.M. Arhierejskij dvor v Tverskom kremle na rubezhe XVII‒XVIII vekov: mestopolozhenie, granicy, harakter zastrojki [Episcopal court in the Tver Kremlin at the turn of the XVII‒XVIII centuries: location, borders, and character of building. Architectural heritage. Vol. 49]. Moscow, 2008, pp. 106–126.
  12. Salimov A.M. Rezidenciya Tverskogo arhiereya na rubezhe XVII‒XVIII vekov: mestopolozhenie, granicy, harakter zastrojki [The residence of the Tver Bishop at the turn of the XVII‒XVIII centuries: location, borders, and character of the building. Tver archaeological collection]. Tver, 2001, Issue 4, vol. 2, pp. 321–341.
  13. Salimov A.M. Srednevekovoe zodchestvo Tveri i prilezhashchih zemel' XII–XVI veka [Medieval architecture of Tver and adjacent lands of the XII‒XVI century. Dissertation for the degree of doctor of art history]. St. Petersburg, 2015. Available at: http://www.rusmuseum.ru/files/rusmuseum/diser/2015/salimov/20/10/2015/salimov_text_diser.pdf
  14. Salimov A.M., Salimova, M.A. Issledovaniya Putevogo dvorca v Tveri [Studies of the Travel Palace in Tver. Archaeological discoveries of 2001]. Moscow, 2002, pp. 200–201.
  15. Svod pamyatnikov arhitektury i monumental'nogo iskusstva Rossii [Set of monuments of architecture and monumental art of Russia. ed.: Soboleva E.G. (resp. ed.) and others. Tver region, part 1]. Moscow, Nauka, 2003, pp. 608–620.
  16. Schenkov A.S. Opyt rekonstrukcii plana Tveri konca XVII v. [Experience of reconstruction of the Tver plan of the end of the XVII century. Architectural heritage. Vol. 28]. Moscow, Stroizdat, 1980, pp. 30.

For citation

Borisov S. Two Centuries of Architectural Evolution of the Tver en Route Palace. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2020, no. 1(50), pp. 47–64. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2020/1kvart20/PDF/03_borisov.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15003