III  2024/2025 . .
 2023-2024
2024 -
ƨ
  "  "


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

4(49) 2019


ArticleARCHITECRURAL SEMIOTICS: HALF A CENTURY IN QUEST FOR IMAGINARY ENTITIES
Authors G. Figurny, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract This article is a fragment of scientific research devoted to the analysis of modern approaches to the understanding of architecture. The article reviews the problematics of questionable efficiency of parascientific methods in the field of cultural studies by analyzing the attempts of using the structural-semiotic approach to the theory and history of architecture
Keywords: architecture, semiotics, semiology, sing systems, methodology, structuralism
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Vlasov V.G. [The pettiness of the architectural theory of postmodernism. Architecton: Proceeding of Higher Education]. 2013, no. 42, pp. 5-12.

  2. Kravchenko A.V. Biosemiotika: na puti k obyedinennoy nauke [Biosemiotics: on the Way to Integral Science. Vestnik MGLU]. 2004, iss. 489, pp. 182-194.
  3. Melodinsky D.L. Arhitekturnaja propedevtika. Istorija, teorija, praktika [Architectural Propaedeutics. History, Theory, Practice. Publisher EDITORIAL URSS. 2018]. Moscow, 400 p.
  4. Rappaport S.H. Ot hudojnika k zritelyu [From artist to viewer]. Moscow, 1978, 236 p.
  5. Stepanov A.V., Ivanova G.I., Nechaev N.N.Arhitektura i psihologija [Architecture and Psychology]. Moscow, Stroyizddat, 1993, 400 p.
  6. Revzin G.I. Ocherki po filosofii arhitecturnoy formy [Essays on the philosophy of architectural form]. Moscow, OGI, 2002, 144 p.
  7. Figurny G.N. K voprosu o psihologicheskih i filosofskih aspectah processa arhitecturnogo proektirovaniya [On the psychological and philosophical aspects of the architectural design process]. Moscow, MARHI, 2018, pp. 252-253.
  8. Eco U. Otsutstvujuscaja struktura; vvedenie v semiologiju [The missing structure. Introduction to Semiology]. St.Petersburg, Symposium, 2006, 544 p.
  9. Yawein O.I. The first experiments of transfer of structural semiotics research methods in architecture (ideas of the 1960’s – 1970s and the problems of modern science. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2017, no. 1(38), pp. 19-31. Available at: https://www.marhi.ru/AMIT/2017/1kvart17/yawein/index.php
  10. Yankovskaya Y.S. Arhitekturnaya kompoziciya i semiotika genesis idey [Architectural composition and semiotics genesis of ideas. Architecton: Proceeding of Higher Education]. 2004, no. 1(38), pp. 32-35. Available at: http://archvuz.ru/2004_2/3
  11. Yankovskaya Y.S. K formirovaniyu sovremennoy arhitecturnoy teorii [To formation of the modern architectural theory]. 2009, no. 1, pp. 90-92.
  12. Donougho M. The Language of Architecture. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 21, no. 3 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 53-67.
  13. Richard Dawkins. Postmodernism disrobed. Nature, 1998, vol. 394, pp. 141-143.
  14. Pallasmaa J. The Thinking Hand, Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. United Kingdom, West Sussex, 2009, 160 p.

For citation

Figurny G. Architectural Semiotics: Half a Century in Quest for Imaginary Entities. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2019, no., pp.57-70. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2019/4kvart19/PDF/04_figurny.pdf DOI: 10.24411/1998-4839-2019-00005