ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL ONLINE JOURNAL 
ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES

3(48) 2019


ArticleSTALIN AND THE FIRST STAGES OF THE COMPETITION FOR THE DESIGN OF THE PALACE OF SOVIRTS (1931–1932)
Authors S. Kuznetsov
Chief Architect of Moscow, First Deputy Chairman of the Moscow City Architecture Committee Moscow, Russia
Abstract Some researchers in the field of architectural history believe that the transition from the Avantgarde to the “Stalinist” style of architecture in the USSR happened because of the personal initiative of the Soviet dictator, I. Stalin. Several authors of publications on the Stalinist period of architecture are particularly strong supporters of this argument. There is no doubt that architecture, like other types of culture – literature, music, theater and cinema – was subject of severe ideological dictates of the ruling power. Stalin did personally intervene in the cultural sphere in a number of famous instances. However, the myth that Stalin initiated a “style break” and completely deprived architects of creative agency in the early 1930s is not supported by archival sources. Russian and foreign historiography has already established that the change in architectural style toward monumentalism was most influenced by the competition for the design of the Palace of Soviets in Moscow. Based on archival research, this article examines the crucial early phases of the Palace competition. It shows that architects played key roles in a stylistic shift that was driven by a number of factors: ideology, personal politics, and spatial and architectural considerations, as well as Stalin's influence.
Keywords: Stalin and architecture, architecture and power, Palace of Soviets, Boris Iofan, transition from Avantgarde to Stalinist architecture
article Article (RUS)
  1. References

  1. Selivanova A.N. Postkonstruktivizm: vlast' i arkhitektura v 1930-ye gody v SSSR [Postconstructivism: power and architecture in the 1930s in the USSR]. Moscow, BuksMArt, 2018.
  2. Suzuki Yu. Konkurs na Dvorets Sovetov 1930-kh godov. v Moskve i mezhdunarodnom arkhitekturnom kontekst. Dis. kandidat isk. [Competition for the Palace of Soviets of the 1930s. in Moscow and the international architectural context (Cand. Dis)]. Moscow, 2014.
  3. Khan-Magomedov S.O. «Stalinskaya imperiya»: problemy, tendentsii, mastera (doklad 2007 g.). Arkhitektura stalinskoy epokhi: opyt istoricheskogo osmysleniya ["Stalin's Empire": problems, trends, masters (2007 report). Architecture of the Stalin era: Experience of historical understanding]. Moscow, NIITIAG RAACS, 2010, pp. 10-24.
  4. Khlevnyuk O.V. Politbyuro. Mekhanizmy politicheskoy vlasti v 1930-ye gody [Politburo. Mechanisms of political power in the 1930s]. Moscow, Rosspan, 1996.
  5. Yakovleva G.N. Tvorchestvo sovetskikh arkhitektorov dovoyennogo vremeni i vlasti. Arkhitektura stalinskoy epokhi: opyt istoricheskogo osmysleniya [Creativity of Soviet architects of prewar time and power. Architecture of the Stalin era: Experience of historical understanding]. Moscow, NIITIAG RAKS, 2010, pp. 25-30.
  6. Hoisington S.S. «Ever Higher»: The Evolution of the Project for the Palace of Soviets. Slavic Review, Vol. 62, no. 1(Spring, 2003), pp. 47-48.
  7. Slezkin Yu. The House of Government: A Saga of the Russian Revolution. Prinston, izdatel'stvo Prinstonskogo universiteta, 2017.

For citation

Kuznetsov S. Stalin and the First Stages of the Competition for the Design of the Palace of Soviets (1931-1932). Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2019, no. 3(48), pp. 51-60. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2019/3kvart19/PDF/04_kuznecov.pdf