III  2024/2025 . .
2024 -
  "  "

English version Russian version


4(45) 2018


E. Logunova, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

Abstract The concept of urban fringe belts was formulated in studies of the city's structure development in the first third of the twentieth century. According to this concept, the peripheral territories of the past periods of a city's development are included to modern city structure and retain their former spatial and functional characteristics. It presents an issue for further urban development of cities. The analysis of structure of fringe belts in various cities of the world confirms the general laws of their formation, development and characteristics. The revealed qualities allow us to affirm the uniqueness of the morphological structure of fringe belts. Undoubtedly, the most important goal in this regard is implementation of the results of historical and theoretical research into practical urban planning, including the domestic practice.
Keywords: fringe-belts, suburban area, land use, urban planning and design, fixation line
article Article (RUS)

  1. Barke M. Morphogenesis, fringe belts and urban size: An exploratory essay. The Built form of Western Cities. Leicester, 1990, pp. 279-299.
  2. Carter H., Wheatley S. Fixation Lines and Fringe Belts, Land Uses and Social Areas: Nineteenth-Century Change in the Small Town. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1979, no. 4, pp. 214-238.
  3. Conzen M. P., Gu K., Whitehand J.W.R. Comparing Traditional Urban Form in China and Europe: A Fringe-Belt Approach. Urban Geography, 2012, no. 33, pp. 22-45.
  4. Conzen M.R.G. Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-Plan Analysis. London, Institute of British Geographers, 1969, 139 p.
  5. Ducom E. Fringe belts in French cities: comparative study of Rennes, Nantes and Tours. Approaches in Urban Morphology. Approaches in Urban Morphology, 2005, pp. 34-43.
  6. Ducom E. Processes of urban change: planning and monitoring strategies through the application of the fringe belt model to Nantes and Rennes, France. IGU, 2005, pp. 7-23.
  7. Hazar D., Kubat A. Fringe belts in the process of urban planning and design: Comparative analyses of Istanbul and Barcelona. ITU A|Z, 2015, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 53-65.
  8. Hopkins M.I.W. Ecological significance of urban fringe-belts. Urban morphology, 2012, vol.16.1, pp. 41-54.
  9. Gu K. Exploring the fringe-belt concept in Auckland: An urban morphological idea and planning practice. New Zealand Geographer, 2010, no. 66(1), pp. 44-60.
  10. Whitehand J.W.R. Urban fringe belts: Development of an idea. Planning Perspectives, 1988, vol. 3, pp. 47-58.
  11. Whitehand J.W.R., Morton N.J. Fringe belts and the recycling of urban land: An academic concept and planning practice. Environment & Planning B, 2003, vol. 30, pp. 819-839.
  12. Whitehand J.W.R. Fringe belts: a neglected aspect of urban geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1967, no. 41, pp. 223-233.
  13. Whitehand J.W.R. Development Cyclesand Urban Landscapes. Geography, 1994, no. 99, pp. 3-17.
  14. Unlu . T. Thinking about urban fringe belts: A Mediterranean perspective. Urban Morphology, 2013, no. 17, pp. 5-20.
  15. Beloborodova D.G., Unagaeva N.A., Kukina I.V. Prostranstvenno-arkhitekturnoe nasledie okrainnykh Poiasov Eniseiska v kontekste razvitiia kul'turnogo turizma [The spatial and architectural heritage of the outlying Poyas Yeniseisk in the context of the development of cultural tourism]. 2017, no. 27, pp.220-228.

For citation

Logunova E. The Phenomenon of Urban Fringe Belts (Case Studies in Overseas Countries). Architecture and Modern Information Technologies, 2018, no.4(45), pp.353-366. Available at: http://marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2018/4kvart18/25_logunova/index.php