ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ

2(35) 2016


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article SOVIET ARCHITECTURAL AVANT-GARDE ATTITUDES TOWARDS ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE AND THE EXISTING CITY
Authors S. Buss, Samara State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Samara, Russia
Abstract The architecture of the Soviet avant-garde in the 1920s and 1930s in Russia has become part of both Russian and global cultural heritage, but is in need of rehabilitation. At the same time, avant-garde discourse in general can appear hostile towards architectural heritage. In that light the task of restoring their works may be considered philosophically flawed. This article examines theoretical works and built projects by OSA, ASNOVA, K. Melnikov, MAO, and the Leningrad and provincial groups with the aim of eliciting the key features of their attitudes towards architectural heritage and the existing city context of their time. A wide range of positions from radical disregard to sensitive contextualism can be discerned both within the internal discourse of individual groups and between them. The influence of the existing city fabric on built projects can be observed. In conclusion it is suggested that the concern to rehabilitate soviet avant-garde architectural heritage is theoretically consistent and that such projects should have a complex relationship to their contemporary urban context.
Keywords: Soviet avant-garde, Constructivism (architecture), Rationalism (architecture), architectural heritage, restoration
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. Heynen H. Transitoriness of Modern Architecture, in: Cunningham, A. Modern Movement Heritage. London and New York, 1998, 200 p.
  2. Buss S. View from Samara, Russia. The Architectural Review, 2015, no. 1415, p.31.
  3. Cooke C. Professional Diversity and its Origins, Architectural Design Profile. No. 93. Architectural Design. Vol. 61, 1991, pp. 8-21.
  4. Cooke C. Russian avant-garde theories of art, architecture and the city. London, 1995, 208 p.
  5. Glendinning M. The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation: Antiquity to Modernity. London and New York, 2013, 530 p.
  6. Huyssen A. After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism, Indiana & Bloomington, 1986, 244 p.
  7. Buss S. Kontseptsiya 'patiny' v razvitii teorii i praktiki sokhraneniya arkhitekturnogo naslediya [The concept of 'patina' in the development of architectural conservation theory and practice. Scientific and Technical Conference]. Samara, 2015, 199-205 pp.
  8. Vesnin A.A. Nasha deystvitelnost [Our Reality. Journal “Modern architecture”]. Sovremennaya Arkhitektura, 1927, no. 2, pp. 47 – 50.
  9. Gan A. Chto takoe konstruktivizm [What is Constructivism? Journal “Modern architecture”]. 1928, no.3, p.79.
  10. Ginzburg M.Ya. Novye metody arkhitekturnogo myshleniya [New methods of architectural thinking. Journal “Modern architecture”]. 1929, no. 2, pp. 1 – 4.
  11. Ginzburg M.Ya. Natsionalnaya arkhitektura narodov SSSR [National architecture of the peoples of the USSR. Journal “Modern architecture”]. 1926, no. 5-6, pp. 113-115.
  12. Ginzburg M.Ya. Itogi i perspektivy [Review and Prospects. Journal “Modern architecture”]. 1927, no.4-5, pp. 112-118.
  13. Kirikov B.M. Arkhitektura Leningradskogo avangarda: putevoditel [A Guide to the Architecture of the Leningrad Avant-garde]. St Petersburg, 2009, 312 p.
  14. Lisitskii El. Izvestiya Assotsiatsii Novykh Arkhitektorov [News of the Association of New Architects]. Moscow, 1926.
  15. Samogorov V.A. Arkhitektura Aleksandra i Petra Shcherbachevykh v Samare: Kn. II: Arkhitektor Petr Shcherbachev [The Architecture of Alexander and Peter Shcherbachov in Samara: Book 2: Peter Shcherbachov, Architect]. Samara, 2014, 480 p.
  16. Khan-Magomedov S.O. Arkhitektura sovetskogo avangarda: Kn. 1: Problemy formoobrazovaniya [The Architecture of the Soviet Avant-garde: Book 1: Problems of Design]. Moscow, 1996, 709 p.
  17. Khan-Magomedov S.O. Moisei Ginzburg [Moisei Ginzburg]. Moscow, 2007, 135 p.
  18. Khan-Magomedov S.O. Ivan Nikolaev [Ivan Nikolaev]. Moscow, 2008, 180 p.
  19. Khiger R. Formalizm: ideologiya upadonichestva v sovetskoi arkhitekture [Formalism: the Ideology of Decadance in Soviet Architecture. Journal “Modern architecture”]. 1929, no.4, pp. 142-146.
  20. Chepkunova I. Istoriya naslediya arkhitektora Melnikova [The History of the Heritage of the Architect Melnikov]. Moscow, 2015, pp. 15-19.
  21. Zhizn OSA [The life of OSA. Journal “Modern architecture”]. 1928, no.1, p. 38.
  22. Barkhin I. Mastera sovetskoi arkhitektury ob arkhitekture: izbrannye otryvki iz picem, statei, vystuplenii i traktatov: v 2 tomakh [Masters of Soviet Architecture on Architecture: selected extracts from letters, articles, speeches and tracts: in 2 volumes]. Moscow, 1975.