-       XX-XXI »
,      2020
 / English site / AMIT / 2016 / 1kvart16 / timer

1(34) 2016


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article COMPOSITIONAL PROBLEMS OF INHERITANCE IN THE ARCHITECTURE OF HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS OF POSTWAR MOSCOW
Authors S. Timerbaeva, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract Many traces of different styles can be recognized in the architecture of high-rise buildings of postwar Moscow and the question of the role of a historical prototype is the most problematic and controversial in it. However, compositional problems of inheritance in the architecture of high-rise buildings have never been the subject of a special study.

For most contemporary architects and theorists the legacy of the avant-garde is the most attractive in the history of architecture. In addition to formal-compositional borrowing the manifestation of refuse the heritage is automatically absorbed, understood as the most successful strategy of innovation. The idea, that a prerequisite for the new creation is the rejection of the old, rooted not only in the minds of practicing architects, but in architectural theory too. Consequently the key theoretical problem is reduced to a simple recognition of the prototype that supplies simplified view of the architectural composition and indicates the minor role of inheritance in the creative process.
Keywords: historical prototype, compositional inheritance strategy
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. Paperny V.Z. Kultura dva [Culture two]. Moscow, 2006, 408 p.
  2. Loktev V.I. Stil-pritvorsik, stil-poliglot: opyt teoreticheskogo osmyslenie stila Ar Deko [Stylepretender, polyglot style: experience of theoretical understanding of style Art Deco]. Moscow, 2009, 320 p.
  3. Bokov A.V. Pro Ar Deko [Ar Deko. Magazine Proekt Rossiya]. 2001, no. 1(19). pp. 89-96.
  4. Malinina T.G. Formula stila Ar Deko: istoki, regionalnye varianti, osobennosti evolutsii. [Style formula. Art Deco: the origins, regional variations, specificity of the evolution]. Moscow, 2005, 302 p.
  5. Kirichenko E.I. Russkaya arhitektura 1830-1910 gg. [Russian architecture in 1830-1910 years]. Moscow, 1978, 399 p.
  6. Rasuleva U.V. Kompozitsionniye problemi nasledovaniya hudogestvennoi traditsii v arhitekture neorusskogo stila [Compositional problems of inheritance of artistic tradition in the architecture of neo-russian style. (Cand. Dis. Thesis)]. Moscow, 1993, 24 p.
  7. Dobritsyna I.A. Ot postmodernizma k nelineinoi arhitekture: Arhitektura v kontekste sovremennoy filosofii i nauki [From postmodernism to nonlinear architecture: Architecture in context of modern philosophy and science]. Moscow, 2004, 448 p.
  8. Loktev V.I. O cheredovanii poliizobrazitelnyh (polifonicheskih) i garmonicheskih stiley [About rotation of poliartistic and harmonic styles. Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference of the faculty, students and young scientists]. Moscow, 2014, P. 647.
  9. Groys B.E. Gesamtkunstwerk [Gesamtkunstwerk Stalin]. Moscow, 2013, 168 p.
  10. Groys B.E. Kommunisticheskiy postskriptum [The Communist Postscript]. Moscow, 2014, 112 p.
  11. Groys B. E. Politika poetiki [The politics of poetics]. Moscow, 2012, 400 p.
  12. Loktev V. I. Barokko ot Mikelangelo do Gvarini. Problema stilya [Baroque: from Michelangelo to Guarini. The problem of style]. Moscow, 2004, 496 .