МАРХИ
ЛИЧНЫЙ КАБИНЕТ СТУДЕНТА
ПРОЕКТНЫЕ ГРУППЫ III КУРСА 2024/2025 уч. г.
КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ 2023-2024
Выборы заведующих кафедрами. Конкурс ППС
ФАКУЛЬТЕТ ПОВЫШЕНИЯ КВАЛИФИКАЦИИ
2024 - ГОД СЕМЬИ
НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ПРОЕКТ "Наука и Университеты"
СТАЖЁР Минобрнауки России
ЗАЩИТА ПРАВ НЕСОВЕРШЕННОЛЕТНИХ В СЕТИ ИНТЕРНЕТ

3(28) 2014


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article SCENARIO-BASED DESIGN PARADIGM IN EVADING UNCERTAINTY IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
Authors Jawdat Goussous, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Abstract Scenario-based design techniques belong to this complementary approach. In scenario based design, descriptions of how people accomplish tasks are a primary working design representation.

The scenario describes a sequence of actions and events that lead to an outcome. These actions and events are related in a usage context that includes the goals, plans, and reactions of the people taking part in the episode.

The concepts underlying ‘scenario-based’ design are introduced. From the analysis of a number of structured interviews with practicing designers, key design scenarios are identified. These scenarios are then generalised and outline guidelines developed for structuring early stage design.
Keywords: scenario, architectural design, guidelines, uncertainty
article Article
References
  1. Makhov S.А. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie mirovoj dinamiki i ustojchivogo razvitiya na primere modeli Forrestera [Mathematical Modeling of Global Dynamics and Sustainable Development on the Example of Forrester's Model]. Available at: http://www.keldysh.ru/papers/2005/prep06/prep2005_06.html
  2. Al-Azhari, W. (2008), Scenarios as a Design Method in Architectural Practice and Architectural Education, PhD Dissertation, the University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom.
  3. Arnheim, R. (1969), Visual Thinking, Berkeley, University of California Press.
  4. Buchanan, Richard (1992), Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, Design Issues volume 8, number 2, pp. 5-22.
  5. Frankenberger, E. and P. Badke-Schaub (1996) Modelling design processes in industry – empirical investigations of design work in practice, In: Akin, O. and G. Saglamer, (Eds) (1996), Proceedings of DMD”96, Istanbul.
  6. Gero, J. S. (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design, AI Magazine Vol 11 No 4 (1990), pp. 26–36.
  7. Gero, J. S. and U. Kannengiesser (2004) The situated function-behaviour-structure framework Design Studies 25 (2004), pp. 373-391.
  8. Goldschmidt, G. (1991), The Dialectics of Sketching, Creativity Research Journal 4, pp. 123-143.
  9. Kolb, D. (1984), Experiential Learning as a Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
  10. Macmillan, S., J. Steele, S. Austin, P. Kirby, and R. Spence (2001), Development and verification of a generic frame-work for conceptual design. Design Studies 22 (2001), pp. 169-191.
  11. Newman, M. W., and J. A. Landay, (2000). Sitemaps, story-boards, and specifications: A sketch of web site design practice. In DIS’00 (pp. 263-274).
  12. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books (reprinted in 1995).
  13. Schön, D. A. (1988).Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies, 9(3), pp. 181-190.
  14. Schön, D. A. (1992), Designing as a reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), pp. 3-14.
  15. Schön, D. A. and G. Wiggins (1992) Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies 13 (1992), pp. 135–156.
  16. Suchman, L. A. (1987) Plans and situated actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
  17. Winograd, T. and F. Flores (1986) Understanding computers and cognition, Ablex, Norwood NJ.