ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ

4(21) 2012


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article URBAN PLANNING IN A FACE OF NEW CHALLENGES
Authors Iouri Moisseev, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract In conditions of growing economic crisis, urban development sector have to play an important role in stabilizing the situation. Successful urban development in a changing environment will not be possible without proper coordination of political, administrative and financial interests of individuals, groups and society as a whole. Therefore, all decisions must be consistent with the highest principles of crisis management and the interests of the whole society, not a separate group. In such circumstances, the urban planning system will be strategically focused and organized. It should also be effectively controlled by monitoring the implementation of the strategy. The planning system oriented strategy can mobilize the necessary resources for development. Improving the system of urban planning through the development of strategic plans and programs, and accordingly, the selection criteria for the evaluation of the implementation will also help to improve the quality of life and harmonization of management arrangements development of cities and regions.
Keywords: Urban planning, sustainable development, urban development management, strategic planning, planning paradigms
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. Healey P. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies, 2nd Edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 368 p.
  2. Moisseev I.M. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii [Architecture and construction of Russia]. 2010, no. 4, pp. 26-37.
  3. Meteleva Å.R. Razvitie gorodov v uslovijah globalizacii [Urban development in a globalizing world]. Novosibirsk, 2010, 158 p.
  4. Vladimirov V.V. Dialog s prostranstvom [Dialogue with the space]. Moscow, 2004, 211 p.
  5. Glazychev V.L. Gorod bez granic [City without boarders]. Moscow, 2011, 400 p.
  6. Klosterman, R. Arguments for and against planning/ in Fainstein S. and Scott C. (eds) Readings in planning theory. Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, p. 150–168.
  7. Moisseev I.M. Arhitektura I stroitel’stvo Rossii [Architecture and construction of Russia]. 2009, no. 11, pp. 28-37.
  8. Bengs C. Planning theory for the naive? Available at: http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/
  9. Smoliar I.M. Gradostroitel’stvo i obshhestvo [Urban development and society]. Available at: http://www.asm.rusk.ru/00/asm2/asm2_5.htm
  10. Petrov A.N. Teorija planirovanija: pervoe priblizhenie [The theory of planning: a first approximation]. Saint Petersburg, 2007, 144 p.
  11. Cheema G.S. and Rondinelli D.A. (eds) Decentralizing governance: emerging concepts and practices. Brookings Institution Press, 2007.
  12. Lubovnyi V.Y., Sdobnov Y.A. Moskva i stolichnyj region: problemy regulirovanija social’no-jekonomicheskogo i prostranstvennogo razvitija [Moscow and Moscow region: problems of regulation of socio-economic and territorial development]. Moscow, 2011, 401 p.
  13. Kolontai À.N. Jeconomica megapolisov i regionov [Economy of megacities and regions]. 2009, no. 5 (29), pp. 20-28.
  14. Healey P. Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. – London: Routledge, 2007, xiv, 328 p.
  15. Hillier J. Stretching beyond the horizon: a multiplanar theory of spatial planning and governance. - Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, viii, 400 p.
  16. Salet W. The institutional approach to strategic planning/ in Salet W., Faludi A. (eds) The revival of strategic spatial planning. – Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2000, p. 13-24.
  17. Leontiev B.B. Economica megapolisov i regionov [Economy of megacities and regions]. 2010, no. 1(31), pp. 14-21.
  18. Belikova I.P. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy upravlenija social’no-jeconomicheskim razvitiem goroda na osnpove vnedrenija informacionnyh tehnologij [Handling of information technology to enhance management of socio-economic development of the city]. Stavropol, 2009, 311 p.
  19. Lapin Y.N. Arhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii [Architecture and construction of Russia]. 2010, no. 12, pp. 28-37.
  20. Kalinnikova I.O. Upravlenie social’no- jekonomicheskim potencialom regiona [Management of socio-economic potential of the region]. Saint Petersburg, 2009, 240 p.
  21. Faludi A. Strategic planning in Europe: Institutional aspects/ in: Salet W., Faludi A. (eds) The revival of strategic planning. – Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. 2000, p. 243-258.
  22. Moisseev I.M. Mir gorodov [The world of cities]. 2010, no. 7, pp. 30-31.
  23. Tkachenko L.Y., Ivashkina I.V. Jekonomika megapolisov i regionov [Economy of megacities and regions]. 2009, no. 5 (29), pp. 20-28.
  24. Forester J. Planning in the face of power. - Berkeley: University of California press, 1989, xx, 283 p.
  25. Ogloblina M.E. Jekonomika megapolisov i regionov [Economy of megacities and regions]. 2010, no. 1(31), pp. 2-5.
  26. Mityagin S.D. Prostranstvennoe planirovanie kak instrument ustojchivogo razvitija Rossijskoj Federacii [Spatial planning as a tool for sustainable development of the Russian Federation]. 2006. Available at: http://gugenplan.spb.ru/index.php?id=133&l=RU
  27. Mintzberg H. The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving the roles for planning, plans, planners. – New York: Free Press, 1994, xix, 458 p.
  28. Sanyal B. Globalization, ethical compromise and planning theory. Planning Theory. 2002, no. 1(2), p. 116-123.