МАРХИ
ЛИЧНЫЙ КАБИНЕТ СТУДЕНТА
ПРОЕКТНЫЕ ГРУППЫ III КУРСА 2024/2025 уч. г.
КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ 2023-2024
Выборы заведующих кафедрами. Конкурс ППС
2024 - ГОД СЕМЬИ
ВМЕСТЕ ПРОТИВ КОРРУПЦИИ
ФАКУЛЬТЕТ ПОВЫШЕНИЯ КВАЛИФИКАЦИИ
НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ПРОЕКТ "Наука и Университеты"
СТАЖЁР Минобрнауки России
ЗАЩИТА ПРАВ НЕСОВЕРШЕННОЛЕТНИХ В СЕТИ ИНТЕРНЕТ

2(19) 2012


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article TOWN-PLANNING STRUCTURES OF NEW CITIES OF GREAT BRITAIN CONSTRUCTED FOR ENLIGHTENING OF BIG CITIES AND REGIONS AND SUPPORT OF UNSUCCESSFUL AREAS
Authors V. Shemyakina, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract Town-planning structures of new cities of Great Britain designed and constructed during the period from 1930 for 1970 for enlightening of big cities and regions and support of unsuccessful areas are considered. The basic attention is given intermediate stage cities - Cumbernauld (1955); a new part of city Peterlee - South West Area (1955); Hook (1961), and to cities of the second generation - Skelmersdale (1961), Dawley (1961), Portsmouth (1961), Livingston (1962), Washington (1964), Runcorn (1964), Redditch (1964), Swindon Ipswich (1966), Irvine North Ayrshire (1966), Caersws (1966), Telford (1963 – 1972), Milton Keynes (1967), Peterborough (1967), Northampton (1968), Warrington (1968), Preston (1970), and main national areas of growth Tayside (1967-1970), Humberside (1966-1969) and Severnside (1967-1971). In overwhelming majority of cases irrespective of time and the city site, the planned population has not been reached that is caused by impossibility of the account of specificity of the future population and economy on a design stage. It is revealed that designing of cities with the fixed borders, structure of neigbourhoods with the inhabited groups turned into courtyards, rigid monozoning of a city and the centre, and as centralised cities with the multilevel centres and the maximum relative densities in the centre as Cumbernauld is not expedient. Linear cities and linear structure of the centre with concentration in them of social and public functions and the minimum placing of such objects in residential areas have appeared not effective in the conditions of growth and prevalence of private transport as in Skelmersdale, Hook other linear cities based on the maximum use of private transport. In the majority of cities of the second generation of a highway, underground transitions and bridges have created physical and visual barriers to moving of pedestrians and bicyclists. The form of a uniform axis of highways has not provided the necessary throughput. As there was not justified a designing of the cities calculated on maximum use of private transport. Rather effective have appeared cellular structure of cities with communities of 5000-8000 inhabitants and the local centres, for example as in Runcorn and Telford, orientation of the main facades of residential buildings to city streets, instead of inside and placing of objects of trade and an infrastructure in affinity of roads, system of independent bus routes of type «Busway» in Runcorn, and as system of knots of communications, as points of social activity, for example in Milton - Keynes.
Keywords: Regional planning, New Town, Masterplan, Development
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. Косицкий Я.В. [Сборник научно-технической информации 2.] Институт генерального плана г. Москвы, 1957
  2. Hall Peter, Mark Tewdwr-Jones. [Urban and regional planning. Fourth edition]. London and New York, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2002
  3. Gibbert Frederick, Town Design, The Architectural Press, 1955
  4. Richard Llewelyn-Davie, Town Design, The Town Planning Review, Vol. 37, no. 3 (Oct., 1966), pp. 157-172
  5. Margaret Willis, Sociological Aspects of Urban Structure: Comparison of Residential Groupings Proposed in Planning New Towns., The Town Planning Review, Liverpool University Press, Vol. 39, no. 4 (Jan., 1969), pp. 296-306
  6. Tripp, A., Town Planning and road traffic, London, Arnold, 1944
  7. Florence,P.S., Investment, location and size of plant, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Economic and Social Studies, no. VII, University Press, Cambridge, 1948
  8. Josephine P. Reynolds, The Plan: The Changing Objectives of the Drawn Plan, The Town Planning Review, Vol. 32, no. 3/4, Land Use In An Urban Environment: A General View of Town and Country Planning (October 1961 – January 1962), pp. 151-184 Liverpool University Press
  9. Crompton D. H., Layout: The Influence of Planning on the Local Urban Environment, Land use in urban environment: A General View of Town and Country Planning, The Town Planning Review, Vol. 32, no. 3/4 (Oct. 1961 – Jan.1962), p. 210
  10. Alexander, C., 'A City is not a Tree', Design, London, February 1966
  11. W Houghton Evans., Architecture and Urban Design, The Construction Press, Lancaster, London and New York, 1978
  12. Frederic, J. Osborn, Arnold Whittick, with an introduction Lewis Mumford., The New Towns. The answer to megalopolis. London,Leonard Hill, 1963
  13. Cumbernauld New Town, Planning Proposals, Cumbernauld Development Corporation, 1959
  14. Peter Daniel, [A New Suburban Landscape: The South West Area: Peterlee New Town], The Town Planning Review, Vol. 31, no. 3 (Oct., 1960), pp. 210-218
  15. The Planning of a New Town, London County Council, 1961
  16. Wilson, Hugh and Womersley. Skelmersdale New Town. Skelmersdale Development Corporation, 1964
  17. D. Field, New Town and Town Expansion Schemes: Part III: Five New Towns Planned for Populations of 80,000 to 100,000, The Town Planning Review, Vol. 39, no. 3 (Oct., 1968), pp. 196-216
  18. Daniel P. G., Chiet Architect and Planning Oracer Livingston New Town. Master Plan. Livingston Development Corporation, 1963
  19. Arthur and Associates. Runcorn New Town. Master Plan. Runcorn Development Corporation, 1967
  20. The Architectural Review, Town planning Mark 3 New Town, v.140, no. 833, p.65-66
  21. Brough C.W., [Halton Unitary Development Plan]. Operational Director – Planning, Environment Directorate, Halton Borough Council, Rutland House, Halton Lea, Runcorn, Cheshire, 2005
  22. Wilson and Womersley in association with Michael Brown. Redditch New Town. Report on Planning Proposals. Redditch Development Corporation, 1966
  23. Wilson and Womersley in association with Jamieson and Mackay and William Gillespie and Associates. Irvine New Town. Final Report on Planning Proposals. Scottish Development Corporation, 1967
  24. Rodney S. Tolley, Telford New Town: Conception and Reality in West Midlands Industrial Overspill, The Town Planning Review, Vol. 43, no. 4 (Oct., 1972), pp. 343-360
  25. Madin, John H. D., and Partners. Dawley : Wellington: Oakengates.- Ministry of Housing and Local Government. H.M.S.O. London, 1966
  26. Design For Community Safety, Local Development Framework, Supplementary Planning Document, Telford and Wrekin Council, June 2008
  27. Bendixson Terence, «Milton Keynes: The newest new town», Arhcitectural Review 1969a, V.146, no. 870, p. 103-108
  28. Shemyakina V.A., Skelmersdale - The Example of the English town – companion for enlightening big cities. Architecture and modern information technologies. Vol. 1,no 18, 2012