1(18) 2012

Article	COMPARISON OF ORDER AND MODERN PRINCIPLES IN THE MORPHOGENESIS
Authors	E. Shirinyan, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract	Tradition of architectural order manifested itself over the centuries in various forms, acquiring new meanings and images, technologies and materials; it developed in various political and social contexts. The author draws attention to the actively growing "digital" trend with a view to identify key concepts and a comparison with the order principles. This article is based on a number of local studies in the theory of architectural order, and the latest works of Western “digital” theorists: Ben van Berkel, Bernard Cache, Kostas Terzidis, Neil Leach, Liu Yu-Tung and others. The comparison creates the preconditions for a reconsideration of order concepts (tectonics, composition, mimesis and sample) in the context of contemporary architectural discourse and a more precise definition of the conceptual framework of digital architecture against the background of the historical material of the past.
Keywords:	architectural order, tectonics, mimesis, composition, canon, digital architecture, history of architecture, morphogenesis
	Article (RUS)
References	Azizyan I.A. Teorija kompozicii kak pojetika arhitektury [The theory of a composition as poetics of architecture]. Moscow, 2002, p. 130 – 165. Dobritsyna I. A. Ot postmodernizma k nelinejnoj arhitekture [From Postmodernism to Nonlinear Architecture]. Moscow, 2004, 416 p. Kozlov D.Yu. Struktury-obolochki na osnove topologicheskih uzlov // Fundamentalnye issledovanija RAASN po nauchnomu obespecheniju arhitektury.. [Skin-Structures based on Topological Nodes. / RAASN Researches]. p.137-145. Lebedeva G.S. Teorija kompozitsii kak poetika arhitektury [Composition Theory as Poetics of Architecture]. Moscow, 2002, p. 21 – 37. Losev A.F., Taho-Godi A.A. Antichnaja literatura [The Literature of Antiquity]. Moscow, 1997, 543 p. Markuzon V.F. Klassicheskaja ordernaja sistema I nekotorye vorposy teorii I tvorcheskoj praktiki sovetskoj arhitektury. [The Classical System of Architectural Order and Certain Issues of Theory and Practice in Soviet Architecture]. Moscow, 1954, 21 p. Putjatin I.E. Idealnyj order v arhitekturnoj teorii Novogo vremeni I tserkovnaja arhitektura epohi Prosveshhenija [An Ideal Order in Architeral Theory of the New Age and the Ecclesiastic Architecture of Enlightment]. Moscow, 2002, 94 p. Taruashvili L.I. Jestetika arhitekturnogo ordera [Aesthetics of Architectural Order]. Moscow, 1995, 178 p. Shubenkov M.V. Strukturnye zakonomernosti arhitekturnogo formoobrazovanija [Structural Regularities of Morphogenesis in Architecture]. Moscow, 2006, 321 p. Hadid Z., Schumakher P. Project International 21.[Project international 21]. p.164-165. Alexander Ch. New Concepts in Complexity Theory. Available at: http://www.natureoforder.com/library/scientific-introduction.pdf Aureli P.V., Mastrigli G. Beyond the Diagram. Iconography, Discipline, Architecture. Peter Eisenman: Feints (ed. Silvio Cassarà), Skira, 2006, p. 111-123. Burry M. Scripting Cultures. John Wiley & Sons, 2011, 272 p. Frampton K. Studies in Tectonic Culture. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1995, 446 p. Futurist Manifestos, edited by Umberto Apollonio. London, 1973, p. 26-27. Gruber P. Biomimetics in Architecture. SpringerWienNewYork, 2011, 1-st Edition, 280 p. Liu Yu-Tung (Editor) New Tectonics. Birkhauser, 2009, 206 p. Picon A. Digital Culture in Architecture: An Introduction for the Design Professions. Birkhauser, 2010, 225 p. Rabreau Daniel Les dessins d’architecture au XVIII siècle. La bibliothèque de l’Image, 2001, 167 p. Semper, G. The Four Elements of Architecture and Other Writings. Trans. Harry F. Mallgrave and Wolfgang Herrmann. Cambridge, 1989, 338 p. Summerson, John. The Classical Language of Architecture. Boston: MIT Press, 1965, 80 p. Terzidis K. Algorithmic Complexity: Out of Nowhere. // Complexity. Design Strategy and World View. Birkhäuser Architecture; 1 ed., 2008, p. 75-88. Tramonti M. L.Textile Tectonics: An Interview with Lars Spuybroek // Architectural Design, 2006, V.76 N6, p.52-59.