2(15) 2011

Article	REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HUMANE DWELLING ENVIRONMENT
Authors	R. Arakelyan, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract	In offered paper the problem "anthropomorphism", "humanity" of inhabited space as key value in system of qualities of the inhabited environment rises. Complex consideration of questions of interrelation and interference of the architectural environment and the person through a prism of psychological, visual and behavioral aspects is offered. The factors substantially defining system of values in the field of qualities of the inhabited environment, on an example of our country during XIX-XXI centuries are investigated. At a sight of the author, the given research it is rather actual, as it is directed on consideration of the human factor as key element in modern designing the inhabited environment. The human factor is understood as set anatomic, physiological, psychological and psycho-physiological features. On the basis of various spheres of scientific knowledge, such as videoecology, ergonomics, cognitive psychology, sociology, come to light features of psychological and visual perception, and also key aspects of spatial behavior. The obtained indicators will allow to raise considerably understanding of criteria and requirements to the humane inhabited environment, and also to reconsider system of values in designing the inhabited environment aside the human factor.
Keywords:	human factors, anthropomorphic, video ecology, binocular vision, cognitive psychology, spatial shape, behavior, perception, motivation, sensory system, homogeneous field, homogeneous environment, the visual field, automatic saccades, the emptiness figure
	Article (RUS)
References	Gruca Philippe. La notion d’echelle humaine chez Kircpatric Sale. Universite de Bordeaux - EA 4201 LNS. http://www.implications-philosophiques.org/Habitat/Gruca2.html Bukowski Cécile. L’echelle humaine dans l’architecture contemporaine. 10 novembre 2010. http://www.implications-philosophiques.org/implications-de-la-perception/lechelle-humaine-dans-larchitecture-contemporaine/ A propos de Rem Koolhaas et de l’Office for Metropolitan Architecture. Qu’est-ce-que L’OMA. Orbite. Aaron Betsky, Michael Sorkin, Henk Hofland, Jean Attali, Ian Buruma, p. 6-88., Methode. Neil Leach, Anthony Vidler, Okwui Enwezor, Fredric Jameson, p. 88 – 120. Berdett Richard, Kanai Migel'. Gradostroitel'stvo v jepohu global'noj urbanisticheskoj transformacii. Tekst: Gradostroitel'stvo. PI .06 14., P. 147- 154. M.2006. Mejzer Filipp. Razmetka prostranstva. Arhitektura i kommunikacionnyj dizajn. Tekst: Dizajn. PI. 13. p. 144 – 150. M. 2006. Solso R. Kognitivnaja psihologija. – 6 –e izd. – SPB: Piter, 2011. Arnhejm R. Dinamika arhitekturnyh form / Per. s angl. V.L.Glazychev. – M.: Strojizdat, 1984. – 192p. Filin V.A. Videojekologija. Chto dlja glaza horosho, a chto ploho. -M. : MC-«Videojekologija», 1997 Paderin V.G., Nagmatullina L.K. Social'nye problemy novostroek. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-metodicheskoj i prakticheskoj konferencii po arhitekture i dizajnu. Kazan': KGASA, 1998 g. p. 174-180. 71. Piz. A. Jazyk telodvizhenij. Nizhnij Novgorod: Izd-vo "Aj K'ju", 1992.-257 p: il. http://ecsocman.edu.ru/data/200/883/1216/021.PADERIN.pdf. Gasparjan M.A. Kompozicionnye osobennosti zhilyh domov Erevana XIX-nachala XX v. Arhitekturnoe nasledstvo № 39. Moskva. 1992 g. p. 140-149. Maklakova T.G., Pavlova L.I. Fenomen goroda. M.: Koncern «Krost», 2008. SANAA. Kazuo Sejima, Ryue Nishizava. SEIJO TOWN HOUSES. Japon, Tokio, 2005-2007. EL CROQUIS №139. Architectural topology. Madrid. Spain. p. 247-259.