ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
Êîíêóðñ ïëàêàòîâ, ïîñâÿùåííûé 275-ëåòèþ Ìîñêîâñêîé àðõèòåêòóðíîé øêîëû
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ

3(36) 2016


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL


Article PRECONDITIONS FOR THE URBAN PLANNING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
Authors I. Moisseev , Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract The global changes ought to think seriously on the vulnerability of the flora and fauna of our planet taking into accounts its limited natural resources and ultimately to look for new prospects to reach a harmony within the spatial development. The dynamics of global socio-economic trends show a mixed picture of successes and development failures that are reflected in the divergent impulses of restructuring of the regions and the development of cities. In such development context, a new mission of the urban development should be enhanced by raising the objectives of harmonization of post-global spatial arrangements. To meet these objectives our system of urban planning should be renewed and upgraded. Noting that the prerogative of the successful spatial development are such conditions as the adequacy of the system of urban planning complexity of tasks and the ability to determine the spatial development prospects of the whole system of human settlements. The preconditions for such developments are: efficiency; creativity; functionality; performance accountability; and capacity building for the entire human settlements planning system.
Keywords: urban development, urban planning, theory of urban planning, urban analysis, urban planning uncertainty thresholds
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. UN-Habitat (2009) Planning sustainable cities: global report on human settlements 2009. – London: Earthscan, xxx, 306 p.
  2. UNÑÍS (Habitat) (2001) Cities in a globalizing world: global report on human settlements 2001. – London: Earthscan, xxxviii, 344 p.
  3. Moisseev I.Ì. (2012) Gradostroitel'noye planirovaniye pered litsom novykh vyzovov [Urban planning in a face of new challenges]. Available at: http://www.marhi.ru/eng/AMIT/2012/4kvart12/moiseev/moiseev.pdf
  4. Moisseev I.Ì. (2010) Vliyaniye globalizatsii na evolyutsiyu kul'tury gradostroitel'nogo planirovaniya [The impact of globalization on evolution of urban planning culture. Journal of the International Academy of Sciences (Russian section)]. ¹2, pp. 30-36.
  5. Gunder M. (2008) Ideologies of certainty in a risky reality: beyond the hauntology of planning. Planning theory, 7(2), pð.186-206.
  6. Christensen K. (1985) Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American planning association, 51(1), ðp. 63-73.
  7. Lubovnyi V.J. (2014) Vliyaniye izmeneniy usloviy razvitiya Rossii na gradostroitel'stvo [Effect of economy condition changes in Russia for urban development. Journal “Management of development of territories”]. No. 3, pp. 27-34.
  8. Moisseev I.Ì. (2012) Narashchivaniye potentsiala upravleniya prostranstvennym razvitiyem urbanizirovannykh territoriy [Capacity building for the spatial development of urban areas. Journal Urban Ecology]. No. 3, pp. 13-18.
  9. Alexander E.R. (2015) There is no planning – only planning practices: Notes for spatial planning theories. Journal “Planning theory”, pð. 1-13. Available at: www.pibc.bc.ca/sites/default/files/ExamB -E.R.Alexander-2015There%20Is%20No%20Planning.pdf
  10. Moisseev I.Ì. (2011) Obstoyatel'stva mesta, vremeni i deystviya v menyayushcheysya grammatike gradostroitel'stva [The circumstances of place, time and action within the changing grammar of urban planning. Journal “Architecture and Construction in Russia”]. No. 3, pp. 2-13.
  11. Lola À.Ì. (2013) Strategicheskaya programma razvitiya rossiyskoy gradsistemy: v chem yeye sut'? [The strategic development program of the Russian gradsistemy: what is its essence? Journal “Gradostroitel’stvo”]. No. 3 (25), pp. 28-36.
  12. Moisseev I.Ì. (2014) Sistema gradostroitel'nogo planirovaniya pered litsom vyzovov izmeneniya klimata [The system of urban planning in the face of climate change challenges. Journal “Urban Ecology”]. No. 2, pp. 6-11.
  13. Lazareva I.V., Mel’nikova G.L. (2013) Smena gradostroitel'noy paradigmy na rubezhe XXXXI vekov [Changing the urban planning paradigm at the turn of XX-XXI centuries]. Moscow, pp. 157-159.
  14. Moisseev I.Ì. (2013) Deyesposobnost' sistemy gradostroitel'nogo planirovaniya v usloviyakh neopredelennosti [The urban planning systems capacity in the conditions of uncertainty. Journal “Architecture and Construction in Russia”]. No. 3, pp. 2-12.
  15. Baburin S.N, Muntian Ì.À., Oursoul À.D. (2011) Globalizatsiya v perspektive ustoychivogo razvitiya (monografiya) [Globalization in the sustainable development perspective]. Ìoscow, 496 p.
  16. Kukina I.V. (2014) Tendentsii razvitiya aglomeratsiy. Zarubezhnyy opyt: monografiya [Tendencies of agglomerations development. International experience]. Krasnoyarsk, 144 p. Available at: http://znanium.com/catalog.php?bookinfo=511483
  17. Viktorova L.À. (2013) Chelovek i arkhitektura. Komfortnost' – osnovnoye svoystvo sredy zhiznedeyatel'nosti i yeye normativnoye obespecheniye [Man and architecture. Comfort - a basic property of the built environment and its regulatory support. Journal “Architecture and Construction in Russia”]. No. 2, pp. 2-21.
  18. Moisseev I.Ì., Norkin Ê.B., Sagalov Y.E., Sokolov Ì.Ì. (2007) Zadachi indeksatsii gorodskogo razvitiya i upravleniya (Razomknutyy krug rassmatrivayemykh voprosov) [Tasks to frame indexes to measure urban development and management. Journal “Voprosy ekonomiki perekhodnogo perioda”]. No. 3.
  19. Moisseev I.Ì. (2013) Prostranstva neopredelennosti: chto i kto planiruyet? [Spaces of uncertainty: who is planning and what? Proceedings of the International Union of Economists and the Free Economic Society of Russia]. Volume 173, pp. 317-349.
  20. Moroni S. (2004) Towards a reconstruction of the public interest criterion. Journal “Planning Theory”, no. 3(2), pp. 151-171.
  21. Moisseev I.Ì. (2015) Gradostroitel'naya interpretatsiya sotsial'nogo zakaza: Khartiya obshchestvennogo prostranstva [Urban planning interpretation of the social order: The Charter of the Public Space. Journal “Architecture and Construction in Russia”]. No. 10, pp. 2-11.
  22. Bol’shakov À.G. (2011) Protivorechiya razvitiya goroda i gradostroitel'noye obrazovaniye [The urban development contradictions and urban education]. Available at: http://www.gisa.ru/74184.html
  23. Madera À.G. (2013) Riski i shansy: neopredelennost', prognozirovaniye i otsenka [Risks and chances: uncertainty, forecasting and evaluation]. Ìoscow, 438 p.
  24. Vlasenko N.À. (2013) Neopredelennost' v prave: priroda i formy vyrazheniya [The uncertainty in the law: the nature and forms of expression. Journal “Russian Law Journal”]. Available at: http://www. center-bereg.ru/l576.html
  25. Moisseev I.Ì. (2013) Narashchivaniye potentsiala sistemy gradostroitel'nogo planirovaniya [Capacity-building for the system of urban planning. Journal “Academic Gazette UralNIIproekt RAASN”]. No. 2, pp. 11-16.