ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ

4(33) 2015


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC-TECHNOLOGICAL AND EDUCATIONAL-METHODICAL ASPECTS OF MODERN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION AND DESIGNING WITH THE USAGE OF VIDEO AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES


Article ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIZATION OF CONCEPTS OF HALFTIMBERED ARCHITECTURE
Authors D. Gavrikov, National Association of Researchers of Half-Timbered Architecture, Moscow, Russia
Abstract The work carried out is an analysis of the changes in concept of half-timbered architecture in the Russian scientific and technical literature. The parallels with foreign experience identifies the main problems and contradictions in the Russian-language concept of half-timbered architecture. The proposed new terminology in the field of half-timbered architecture as a way to solve the problems and contradictions that are offered in the universal criteria that belongs to the framework are identified as challenges facing the half-timbered architecture of the moment.
Keywords: timber framing, architecture, theory, terminology, concept, dichotomy
article Article (RUS)
References
  1. Gavrikov D.S. Terminologicheskoe utochnenie poniatija «fahverk» [Terminological specification of concept of framework. In the world of discoveries]. Krasnoyarsk, 2010, no. 6.3 (12), pp. 115-117.
  2. Gavrikov D.S. Jevoljucija ponimanija osnov teorii fahverkovoj arhitektury [Evolution of understanding of bases of the theory of timber-framed architecture. Architecture and time]. Moscow, 2014, no. 2, pp.6 – 8.
  3. Anisimov E.V. Junyj grad. Peterburg vremjon Petra Velikogo [Young city. St. Petersburg Peter the Great]. Saint Petersburg, 2003, P. 370.
  4. Ferster” M. Fahverkovyja postrojki [Half-timbered constructions]. Saint Petersburg, 1904, 582 p.
  5. Strahov” P. Jekonomicheskija postrojki [Economic constructions. Encyclopedic dictionary F.A. Brockhaus and I. A. Efron]. Saint Petersburg, Leipzig, 1904, Vol. XL, pp. 268 – 274.
  6. Stori V. Dachi, villy i osobnjaki: Fasady i plany kamennyh i derevjannyh postroek v novyh stiljah [Dachas, country houses and mansions: Facades and plans of stone and wooden constructions in new styles]. Saint-Peterburg, 1905, 73 p.
  7. Kuhta A.V. Jesteticheskie osobennosti fahverka: paradoksy i paralleli [Esthetic features of the framework: paradoxes and parallels. Construction materials, equipment, technologies of the XXI century]. Moscow, 2013, no. 9 (176), pp. 42 – 45.
  8. Baskaeva N. I. Fahverk: tehnologija s 700-letnej istoriej [Timer framing: technology with 700-year history. Magazine “Woodworking industry”]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 53 – 55.
  9. Didevich A. «Umnyj» fahverk ["Clever" timber framing. Roofing and insulating materials]. Moscow, 2013, pp. 16 – 17.
  10. Krivyh E. G. Fahverk kak gumanitarnaja tehnologija [Timber framing as humanitarian technology. Integration, partnership and innovations in construction science and education. Collection of materials of the international scientific conference]. Moscow, 2015, pp. 52 – 54.
  11. Gerner M. Holzbau. Reiseskizzen und Notizen. Fulda: Deutsches Zentrum für Handwerk und Denkmalpflege, 1996, 118 p.
  12. Fiedler W. Das Fachwerkhaus in Deutschland, Frankreich und England. Zwickau, 1903, 99 p.
  13. Gerner M. Fachwerk macht Schule. Fulda: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Historische Fachwerkstädte, 2008, pp. 61 – 65.
  14. Langenbach R. From “Opus Craticium” to the “Chicago Frame”: Earthquake-Resistant Traditional Construktion. International Journal of Architectural Heritage: Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration. London: Taylor & Fransis, 2007, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, pp. 29 – 59.